Suppr超能文献

除全身应用阿霉素和大剂量甲氨蝶呤外,动脉内注射与静脉注射顺铂对肢体骨肉瘤组织学肿瘤反应的影响。

Effect of intra-arterial versus intravenous cisplatin in addition to systemic adriamycin and high-dose methotrexate on histologic tumor response of osteosarcoma of the extremities.

作者信息

Bacci G, Picci P, Avella M, Ferrari S, Casadei R, Ruggieri P, Brach del Prevert A, Tienghi A, Battistini A, Mancini A

机构信息

Department of Chemotherapy, Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy.

出版信息

J Chemother. 1992 Jun;4(3):189-95. doi: 10.1080/1120009x.1992.11739163.

Abstract

In neoadjuvant treatment of osteosarcoma of the extremities intra-arterial (IA) instead of intravenous (IV) administration of cisplatinum (CDDP) has been advocated to improve local response and consequently increase the percentage of limb salvages and the cure rate. Since the major local advantages from the IA use of CDDP have been recently questioned, a comparative prospective study was performed at the Rizzoli Institute between July 1990 and September 1991. Preoperative chemotherapy consisted of two cycles of high-dose methotrexate (HDMTX), followed 6 days later by CDDP and adriamycin (ADM), HDMTX and ADM were delivered intravenously while CDDP was delivered according to previous randomization, either intra-arterially or intravenously. Of the 79 patients who entered the study 40 received CDDP IA and 39 CDDP IV. The percentage of clinical and radiological response of the tumor as well as the percentage of limb salvage procedures performed was the same in the two groups. However the rate of good histological response (tumor necrosis greater than 90%) was significantly higher in the group of patients who received IA CDDP than in the patients who received the drug intravenously (77.5% vs 46%: p less than 0.01). No differences in terms of local or systemic side effects were found in the two groups. A longer follow-up is necessary to establish if this improved good response rate achieved with IA CDDP will lead to an improved cure rate.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

在肢体骨肉瘤的新辅助治疗中,有人主张采用动脉内(IA)而非静脉内(IV)给予顺铂(CDDP),以改善局部反应,从而提高保肢率和治愈率。由于近期IA使用CDDP的主要局部优势受到质疑,1990年7月至1991年9月在里佐利研究所进行了一项比较性前瞻性研究。术前化疗包括两个周期的大剂量甲氨蝶呤(HDMTX),6天后给予CDDP和阿霉素(ADM),HDMTX和ADM静脉给药,而CDDP根据先前的随机分组,通过动脉内或静脉内给药。在79例进入研究的患者中,40例接受动脉内CDDP,39例接受静脉内CDDP。两组的肿瘤临床和放射学反应百分比以及保肢手术百分比相同。然而,接受动脉内CDDP的患者组的良好组织学反应率(肿瘤坏死大于90%)显著高于静脉内接受该药物的患者(77.5%对46%:p小于0.01)。两组在局部或全身副作用方面未发现差异。需要更长时间的随访来确定动脉内CDDP实现的这种改善的良好反应率是否会导致治愈率提高。(摘要截短至250字)

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验