Suppr超能文献

年幼儿童对隐藏物体的推理:仅来自带有测试试验的违反预期任务的证据。

Young infants' reasoning about hidden objects: evidence from violation-of-expectation tasks with test trials only.

作者信息

Wang Su-Hua, Baillargeon Renée, Brueckner Laura

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of California, 1156 High Street, Santa Cruz, CA 95064, USA.

出版信息

Cognition. 2004 Oct;93(3):167-98. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2003.09.012.

Abstract

The present research examined alternative accounts of prior violation-of-expectation (VOE) reports that young infants can represent and reason about hidden objects. According to these accounts, young infants' apparent success in these VOE tasks reflects only novelty and familiarity preferences induced by the habituation or familiarization trials in the tasks. In two experiments, 4-month-old infants were tested in VOE tasks with test trials only. The infants still gave evidence that they could represent and reason about hidden objects: they were surprised, as indicated by greater attention, when a wide object became fully hidden behind a narrow occluder (Experiment 1) or inside a narrow container (Experiment 2). These and control results demonstrate that young infants can succeed at VOE tasks involving hidden objects even when given no habituation or familiarization trials. The present research thus provides additional support for the conclusion that young infants possess expectations about hidden objects. Methodological issues concerning the use of habituation or familiarization trials in VOE tasks are also discussed.

摘要

本研究考察了关于先前违反预期(VOE)报告的其他解释,即年幼婴儿能够对隐藏物体进行表征和推理。根据这些解释,年幼婴儿在这些VOE任务中的明显成功仅反映了任务中习惯化或熟悉化试验所引发的新奇和熟悉偏好。在两项实验中,仅对4个月大的婴儿进行了VOE任务测试。婴儿们仍然给出了证据,表明他们能够对隐藏物体进行表征和推理:当一个宽物体完全隐藏在一个窄遮挡物后面(实验1)或一个窄容器里面(实验2)时,他们会像通过更多关注所表明的那样感到惊讶。这些结果以及对照结果表明,即使没有给予习惯化或熟悉化试验,年幼婴儿在涉及隐藏物体的VOE任务中也能成功。因此,本研究为年幼婴儿对隐藏物体有预期这一结论提供了额外支持。还讨论了VOE任务中使用习惯化或熟悉化试验的方法学问题。

相似文献

3
Detecting continuity violations in infancy: a new account and new evidence from covering and tube events.
Cognition. 2005 Mar;95(2):129-73. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2002.11.001.
4
Décalage in infants' knowledge about occlusion and containment events: converging evidence from action tasks.
Cognition. 2006 Mar;99(2):B31-41. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2005.01.010. Epub 2005 Jun 6.
5
Developments in young infants' reasoning about occluded objects.
Cogn Psychol. 2002 Sep;45(2):267-336. doi: 10.1016/s0010-0285(02)00005-1.
6
Young infants' expectations about hidden objects.
Cognition. 2005 Sep;97(2):B35-43. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2005.01.007.
7
Investigating looking and social looking measures as an index of infant violation of expectation.
Dev Sci. 2017 Nov;20(6). doi: 10.1111/desc.12452. Epub 2016 Oct 26.
8
2.5-month-old infants' reasoning about when objects should and should not be occluded.
Cogn Psychol. 1999 Sep;39(2):116-57. doi: 10.1006/cogp.1999.0717.
9
Young infants' reasoning about physical events involving inert and self-propelled objects.
Cogn Psychol. 2009 Jun;58(4):441-86. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2008.11.001. Epub 2009 Feb 20.
10

引用本文的文献

1
Hierarchical surprise signals in naturalistic violation of expectations.
Imaging Neurosci (Camb). 2025 Jan 24;3. doi: 10.1162/imag_a_00459. eCollection 2025.
2
The Cognitive Architecture of Infant Attachment.
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2024 Aug 26:17456916241262693. doi: 10.1177/17456916241262693.
3
Infants can use temporary or scant categorical information to individuate objects.
Cogn Psychol. 2024 Mar;149:101640. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2024.101640. Epub 2024 Feb 26.
4
The use of gaze to study cognition: limitations, solutions, and applications to animal welfare.
Front Psychol. 2023 May 2;14:1147278. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1147278. eCollection 2023.
5
Exploring individual differences in infants' looking preferences for impossible events: The Early Multidimensional Curiosity Scale.
Front Psychol. 2023 Feb 2;13:1015649. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1015649. eCollection 2022.
6
Cetacean responses to violation of expectation paradigm in a free-swim context.
Anim Cogn. 2023 Mar;26(2):667-686. doi: 10.1007/s10071-022-01704-7. Epub 2022 Nov 5.
7
Making Sense of Infants' Differential Responses to Incongruity.
Hum Dev. 2020 Oct;64(2):55-63. doi: 10.1159/000509980. Epub 2020 Sep 17.
8
How do the object-file and physical-reasoning systems interact? Evidence from priming effects with object arrays or novel labels.
Cogn Psychol. 2021 Mar;125:101368. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2020.101368. Epub 2021 Jan 6.
9
Do Infants in the First Year of Life Expect Equal Resource Allocations?
Front Psychol. 2019 Feb 19;10:116. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00116. eCollection 2019.
10
Catastrophic individuation failures in infancy: A new model and predictions.
Psychol Rev. 2019 Mar;126(2):196-225. doi: 10.1037/rev0000136. Epub 2018 Dec 13.

本文引用的文献

1
Object Permanence in Five-and-a-Half-Month-Old Infants?
Infancy. 2000 Oct;1(4):403-428. doi: 10.1207/S15327078IN0104_3. Epub 2000 Oct 1.
2
Why Take the Cog Out of Infant Cognition?
Infancy. 2000 Oct;1(4):463-470. doi: 10.1207/S15327078IN0104_6. Epub 2000 Oct 1.
3
Eight-Month-Old Infants' Perception of Possible and Impossible Events.
Infancy. 2000 Oct;1(4):429-446. doi: 10.1207/S15327078IN0104_4. Epub 2000 Oct 1.
5
Infants' Looking at Possible and Impossible Screen Rotations: The Role of Familiarization.
Infancy. 2000 Oct;1(4):389-402. doi: 10.1207/S15327078IN0104_2. Epub 2000 Oct 1.
6
Infants' Preferences for Familiarity and Novelty During the Course of Visual Processing.
Infancy. 2000 Oct;1(4):491-507. doi: 10.1207/S15327078IN0104_9. Epub 2000 Oct 1.
7
Reply to Bogartz, Shinskey, and Schilling; Schilling; and Cashon and Cohen.
Infancy. 2000 Oct;1(4):447-462. doi: 10.1207/S15327078IN0104_5. Epub 2000 Oct 1.
9
Décalage in infants' knowledge about occlusion and containment events: converging evidence from action tasks.
Cognition. 2006 Mar;99(2):B31-41. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2005.01.010. Epub 2005 Jun 6.
10
Event categorization in infancy.
Trends Cogn Sci. 2002 Feb 1;6(2):85-93. doi: 10.1016/s1364-6613(00)01836-2.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验