• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

探索婴儿对不可能事件的注视偏好中的个体差异:早期多维好奇心量表。

Exploring individual differences in infants' looking preferences for impossible events: The Early Multidimensional Curiosity Scale.

作者信息

Lee Nayen, Lazaro Vanessa, Wang Jinjing Jenny, Şen Hilal H, Lucca Kelsey

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, United States.

Department of Psychology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2023 Feb 2;13:1015649. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1015649. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1015649
PMID:36817372
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9931910/
Abstract

Infants are drawn to events that violate their expectations about the world: they look longer at physically impossible events, such as when a car passes through a wall. Here, we examined whether individual differences in infants' visual preferences for physically impossible events reflect an early form of curiosity, and asked whether caregivers' behaviors, parenting styles, and everyday routines relate to these differences. In Study 1, we presented infants ( = 47,  = 16.83 months,  = 10.29-24.59 months) with events that violated physical principles and closely matched possible events. We measured infants' everyday curiosity and related experiences (i.e., caregiver curiosity-promoting activities) through a newly developed curiosity scale, (EMCS). Infants' looking preferences for physically impossible events were positively associated with their score on the EMCS, but not their temperament, vocabulary, or caregiver trait curiosity. In Study 2A, we set out to better understand the relation between the EMCS and infants' looking preferences for physically impossible events by assessing the underlying structure of the EMCS with a larger sample of children ( = 211,  = 47.63 months,  = 10.29-78.97 months). An exploratory factor analysis revealed that children's curiosity was comprised four factors: Social Curiosity, Broad Exploration, Persistence, and Information-Seeking. Relatedly, caregiver curiosity-promoting activities were composed of five factors: Flexible Problem-Solving, Cognitive Stimulation, Diverse Daily Activities, Child-Directed Play, and Awe-Inducing Activities. In Study 2B ( = 42 infants from Study 1), we examined which aspects of infant curiosity and caregiver behavior predicted infants' looking preferences using the factor structures of the EMCS. Findings revealed that infants' looking preferences were uniquely related to infants' Broad Exploration and caregivers' Awe-Inducing Activities (e.g., nature walks with infants, museum outings). These exploratory findings indicate that infants' visual preferences for physically impossible events may reflect an early form of curiosity, which is related to the curiosity-stimulating environments provided by caregivers. Moreover, this work offers a new comprehensive tool, the that can be used to measure both curiosity and factors related to its development, starting in infancy and extending into childhood.

摘要

婴儿会被那些违背他们对世界预期的事件所吸引

他们会更长时间地注视物理上不可能发生的事件,比如汽车穿过墙壁。在此,我们研究了婴儿对物理上不可能发生的事件的视觉偏好上的个体差异是否反映了一种早期形式的好奇心,并询问了照料者的行为、养育方式和日常活动是否与这些差异有关。在研究1中,我们向婴儿(n = 47,M = 16.83个月,范围 = 10.29 - 24.59个月)呈现违背物理原理且与可能发生的事件紧密匹配的事件。我们通过一个新开发的好奇心量表,即早期儿童好奇心量表(EMCS),来测量婴儿的日常好奇心及相关经历(即照料者促进好奇心的活动)。婴儿对物理上不可能发生的事件的注视偏好与他们在EMCS上的得分呈正相关,但与他们的气质、词汇量或照料者的特质好奇心无关。在研究2A中,我们通过对更大样本的儿童(n = 211,M = 47.63个月,范围 = 10.29 - 78.97个月)评估EMCS的潜在结构,来更好地理解EMCS与婴儿对物理上不可能发生的事件的注视偏好之间的关系。一项探索性因素分析表明,儿童的好奇心由四个因素组成:社会好奇心、广泛探索、坚持性和信息寻求。相关地,照料者促进好奇心的活动由五个因素组成:灵活解决问题、认知刺激、多样的日常活动、以儿童为导向的游戏和引发敬畏的活动。在研究2B中(来自研究1的42名婴儿),我们使用EMCS的因素结构来检验婴儿好奇心和照料者行为的哪些方面能够预测婴儿的注视偏好。研究结果表明,婴儿的注视偏好与婴儿的广泛探索和照料者的引发敬畏的活动(如带婴儿散步、去博物馆参观)有着独特的关联。这些探索性结果表明,婴儿对物理上不可能发生的事件的视觉偏好可能反映了一种早期形式的好奇心,这与照料者提供的激发好奇心的环境有关。此外,这项工作提供了一个新的综合工具,即早期儿童好奇心量表,它可以用来测量好奇心及其发展相关的因素,从婴儿期开始并延伸到儿童期。

相似文献

1
Exploring individual differences in infants' looking preferences for impossible events: The Early Multidimensional Curiosity Scale.探索婴儿对不可能事件的注视偏好中的个体差异:早期多维好奇心量表。
Front Psychol. 2023 Feb 2;13:1015649. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1015649. eCollection 2022.
2
Stable individual differences in infants' responses to violations of intuitive physics.婴儿对违反直觉物理规律的反应存在稳定的个体差异。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Jul 6;118(27). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2103805118.
3
Infant-directed communication: Examining the many dimensions of everyday caregiver-infant interactions.婴儿导向式沟通:审视日常照护者与婴儿互动的多个维度。
Dev Sci. 2024 Sep;27(5):e13515. doi: 10.1111/desc.13515. Epub 2024 Apr 15.
4
The developmental origins of naïve psychology in infancy.婴儿期朴素心理学的发展起源。
Adv Child Dev Behav. 2009;37:55-104. doi: 10.1016/s0065-2407(09)03702-1.
5
Increased visual interest and affective responses to impossible figures in early infancy.婴儿早期对不可能图形的视觉兴趣和情感反应增强。
Infant Behav Dev. 2019 Nov;57:101341. doi: 10.1016/j.infbeh.2019.101341. Epub 2019 Aug 2.
6
Mechanisms of social evaluation in infancy: A preregistered exploration of infants' eye-movement and pupillary responses to prosocial and antisocial events.婴儿期社会评价的机制:一项关于婴儿对亲社会和反社会事件的眼动及瞳孔反应的预注册探索。
Infancy. 2022 Mar;27(2):255-276. doi: 10.1111/infa.12447. Epub 2021 Dec 6.
7
The Efficiency of Infants' Exploratory Play Is Related to Longer-Term Cognitive Development.婴儿探索性玩耍的效率与长期认知发展相关。
Front Psychol. 2018 May 31;9:635. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00635. eCollection 2018.
8
The role of dyadic combinations of infants' behaviors and caregivers' verbal and multimodal responses in predicting vocabulary outcomes.婴儿行为与照顾者言语及多模态反应的二元组合在预测词汇量结果中的作用。
Infancy. 2025 Jan-Feb;30(1):e12626. doi: 10.1111/infa.12626. Epub 2024 Sep 25.
9
Do you believe in magic? Infants' social looking during violations of expectations.你相信魔法吗?婴儿在违背预期时的社会注视。
Dev Sci. 2007 Sep;10(5):654-63. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2007.00607.x.
10
Individual differences provide new insight into infant looking.个体差异为婴儿注视提供了新的视角。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2021 Nov;25(11):925-926. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2021.08.004. Epub 2021 Sep 3.

引用本文的文献

1
The Infant and Toddler Curiosity Questionnaire: A Validated Caregiver-Report Measure of Curiosity in Children From 5 to 24 Months.婴幼儿好奇心问卷:一种经过验证的由照料者报告的5至24个月儿童好奇心测量工具。
Infancy. 2025 Jan-Feb;30(1):e70001. doi: 10.1111/infa.70001.

本文引用的文献

1
We need to talk about validity - A commentary on "Six solutions for more reliable infant research" from the viewpoint of an early executive functions researcher.我们需要谈谈效度——从早期执行功能研究者的视角对《让婴儿研究更可靠的六种解决方案》的评论。
Infant Child Dev. 2022 Sep-Oct;31(5):e2352. doi: 10.1002/icd.2352. Epub 2022 Jun 7.
2
Should I learn from you? Seeing expectancy violations about action efficiency hinders social learning in infancy.我是否应该向你学习?看到关于动作效率的预期违背会阻碍婴儿期的社会学习。
Cognition. 2023 Jan;230:105293. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2022.105293. Epub 2022 Sep 30.
3
Zoom, Zoom, Baby! Assessing Mother-Infant Interaction During the Still Face Paradigm and Infant Language Development a Virtual Visit Procedure.
Zoom,Zoom,宝贝!在静脸范式和婴儿语言发展过程中评估母婴互动——一种虚拟访问程序。
Front Psychol. 2022 Feb 16;12:734492. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.734492. eCollection 2021.
4
Violations of expectation trigger infants to search for explanations.违背预期会促使婴儿寻找解释。
Cognition. 2022 Jan;218:104942. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104942. Epub 2021 Nov 2.
5
Stable individual differences in infants' responses to violations of intuitive physics.婴儿对违反直觉物理规律的反应存在稳定的个体差异。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Jul 6;118(27). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2103805118.
6
Children With More Uncertainty in Their Intuitive Theories Seek Domain-Relevant Information.儿童的直觉理论越不确定,他们就越会寻求与领域相关的信息。
Psychol Sci. 2021 Jul;32(7):1147-1156. doi: 10.1177/0956797621994230. Epub 2021 Jun 28.
7
Examining the impact of children's exploration behaviors on creativity.考察儿童探索行为对创造力的影响。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2021 Jul;207:105091. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2021.105091. Epub 2021 Mar 4.
8
Unpacking wonder: from curiosity to comprehension.解开奇迹之谜:从好奇到理解。
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2021 Oct;1501(1):10-29. doi: 10.1111/nyas.14317. Epub 2020 Jun 9.
9
"I don't know but I know who to ask": 12-month-olds actively seek information from knowledgeable adults.“我不知道,但我知道该问谁”:12 个月大的婴儿积极向知识渊博的成年人寻求信息。
Dev Sci. 2020 Sep;23(5):e12938. doi: 10.1111/desc.12938. Epub 2020 Feb 26.
10
Are awe-prone people more curious? The relationship between dispositional awe, curiosity, and academic outcomes.敬畏倾向的人更有好奇心吗?性格敬畏、好奇心与学业成绩的关系。
J Pers. 2020 Aug;88(4):762-779. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12524. Epub 2019 Dec 10.