Bogartz Richard S, Shinskey Jeanne L, Schilling Thomas H
Department of Psychology University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
Department of Behavioral Sciences Fitchburg State College.
Infancy. 2000 Oct;1(4):403-428. doi: 10.1207/S15327078IN0104_3. Epub 2000 Oct 1.
Event Set × Event Set designs were used to study the rotating screen paradigm introduced by Baillargeon, Spelke, and Wasserman (1985). In Experiment 1, 36 5 1/2-month-old infants were habituated to a screen rotating 180° with no block, a screen rotating 120° up to a block, or a screen rotating 180° up to and seemingly through a block. All infants were then tested on the same 3 events and also a screen rotating 120° with no block. The results indicate that infants are using novelty and familiarity preference to determine their looking times. To confirm this, in Experiment 2, 52 5 1/2-month-old infants were familiarized on either 3 or 7 trials to a screen rotating 180° with no block or a screen rotating 120° with no block. All infants were then tested on the same test events as in Experiment 1. Infants with fewer familiarization trials were more likely to prefer the familiar rotation event. The results of these 2 experiments indicate that infants did not use the possibility or impossibility of events but instead used familiarity or novelty relations between the habituation events and the test events to determine their looking times, and suggest that the Baillargeon et al. study should not be interpreted as indicating object permanence or solidity knowledge in young infants.
事件集×事件集设计被用于研究由贝拉吉恩、斯佩尔克和瓦瑟曼(1985年)引入的旋转屏幕范式。在实验1中,36名5个半月大的婴儿被分别习惯了以下三种情况:一个屏幕旋转180°且无障碍物,一个屏幕旋转120°直到碰到障碍物,或者一个屏幕旋转180°直到似乎穿过一个障碍物。然后,所有婴儿都接受了相同的这3个事件的测试,以及一个屏幕旋转120°且无障碍物的测试。结果表明,婴儿利用新奇性和熟悉性偏好来确定他们的注视时间。为了证实这一点,在实验2中,52名5个半月大的婴儿在3次或7次试验中被分别习惯了一个屏幕旋转180°且无障碍物,或者一个屏幕旋转120°且无障碍物的情况。然后,所有婴儿都接受了与实验1相同的测试事件。熟悉试验次数较少的婴儿更有可能更喜欢熟悉的旋转事件。这两个实验的结果表明,婴儿不是利用事件的可能性或不可能性,而是利用习惯化事件和测试事件之间的熟悉性或新奇性关系来确定他们的注视时间,并表明贝拉吉恩等人的研究不应被解释为表明婴儿具有客体永久性或实体性知识。