Chen Shawn C, Rex Douglas K
Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Am J Gastroenterol. 2004 Jun;99(6):1081-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2004.03279.x.
Bispectral (BIS) monitoring has been used to evaluate depth of sedation in intensive care and surgical patients. We sought to explore its utility as a monitoring device for nurse-administered propofol sedation (NAPS) during colonoscopy.
Fifty consecutive patients (ASA I or II) receiving NAPS for outpatient colonoscopy were evaluated. BIS scores, sedation scores, and propofol dosing were correlated. The nurses assessed the usefulness of BIS by questionnaire.
The mean (SD) dose of propofol required to produce a BIS value </= 60 was 109.4 (43.9) mg and an Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation (OAA/S) score of 1 (deep sedation) was 91.4 (44.8) mg (p < 0.0001). The mean times required to achieve BIS values </= 60 (188 +/- 147.1 s) and </= 70 (164.3 +/- 95.1 s) were significantly longer than the mean time required to achieve an OAA/S of 1 (117.4 +/- 93.0 s, p= 0.0007). Similarly, during the recovery phase, there was a lag time of 197.9 s between mean (SD) time required from the last dose of propofol to an OAA/S of 5 (372.1 +/- 197.1 s) and the mean (SD) time required from the last dose of propofol to a BIS value >/= 90 or return to baseline (570 +/- 279.9 s, p < 0.0001). The mean (SD) BIS value in the maintenance phase of sedation was 58.9 (8.53), with a range of 22-88. Nurses administering propofol rated the usefulness of BIS at a mean of 2.85 (maximum usefulness scored as 4) in guiding the dosing of propofol sedation during the maintenance phase of sedation. No patient required mask ventilation or endotracheal intubation.
The BIS index in its current version is not useful in titrating boluses of propofol to an adequate level of sedation, because there is a substantial lag time between decrease of BIS scores to <70 and OAA/S scores indicative of deep sedation. There is also a substantial lag time between recovery of alertness and return of BIS scores to normal. A controlled trial of whether BIS values can assist in avoiding unnecessary propofol dosing during the maintenance phase of sedation appears warranted.
脑电双频指数(BIS)监测已用于评估重症监护患者和外科手术患者的镇静深度。我们试图探讨其作为结肠镜检查期间护士给予丙泊酚镇静(NAPS)监测设备的效用。
对连续50例接受门诊结肠镜检查NAPS的患者(ASA I或II级)进行评估。将BIS评分、镇静评分和丙泊酚给药剂量进行相关性分析。护士通过问卷调查评估BIS的有用性。
使BIS值≤60所需丙泊酚的平均(标准差)剂量为109.4(43.9)mg,观察者警觉/镇静评估(OAA/S)评分为1分(深度镇静)时丙泊酚平均(标准差)剂量为91.4(44.8)mg(p<0.0001)。达到BIS值≤60(188±147.1秒)和≤70(164.3±95.1秒)所需的平均时间显著长于达到OAA/S评分为1分所需的平均时间(117.4±93.0秒,p = 0.0007)。同样,在恢复阶段,从最后一剂丙泊酚到OAA/S评分为5分所需的平均(标准差)时间(372.1±197.1秒)与从最后一剂丙泊酚到BIS值≥90或恢复至基线所需的平均(标准差)时间(570±279.9秒)之间存在197.9秒的延迟时间(p<0.0001)。镇静维持阶段的平均(标准差)BIS值为58.9(8.53),范围为22 - 88。给予丙泊酚的护士在镇静维持阶段指导丙泊酚镇静给药时对BIS有用性的平均评分为2.85(最高有用性评分为4分)。无患者需要面罩通气或气管插管。
当前版本的BIS指数在将丙泊酚推注滴定至适当镇静水平方面无用,因为BIS评分降至<70与指示深度镇静的OAA/S评分之间存在显著延迟时间。警觉恢复与BIS评分恢复正常之间也存在显著延迟时间。关于BIS值在镇静维持阶段是否有助于避免不必要的丙泊酚给药的对照试验似乎是必要的。