Tabosa Angela, Yamamura Ysao, Forno Eduardo Romão, Mello Luiz Eugênio A M
Division of Chinese Medicine and Acupuncture, Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), Rua Vergueiro, 2045, cj. 1003, Vila Mariana, 04101-000 São Paulo/SP, Brazil.
Dig Dis Sci. 2004 Apr;49(4):602-10. doi: 10.1023/b:ddas.0000026305.20852.41.
We compared the outcomes of the stimulation of specific sets of acupoints with either acupuncture or moxibustion over peristalsis. Twenty-five plastic beads were orally administered in the stomach of the rats and 90 min later animals were sacrificed, the stomach and small intestine were opened, and the number of beads remaining in each segment was counted. Forty rats were immobilized for 20 min and stimulated at either abdominal or hindlimbs acupoints, with either electroacupuncture or moxibustion. Under this restraint (stress) condition electroacupuncture at hindlimb points or moxibustion at abdominal points significantly enhanced gastric emptying (P < 0.02) as well as intestinal motility compared with animals subjected only to immobilization and not stimulated with electroacupuncture or moxibustion. We conclude that the effects of different acupoints and modes of stimulation (electrical vs. moxibustion) over gastrointestinal motility in rats subjected to restraint-induced stress is not uniform and discuss the different neural pathways underlying these differences.
我们比较了针刺或艾灸特定穴位组对大鼠蠕动的刺激效果。将25颗塑料珠经口给予大鼠胃内,90分钟后处死动物,打开胃和小肠,计数各段剩余珠子的数量。将40只大鼠固定20分钟,并分别用电针或艾灸刺激腹部或后肢穴位。在这种约束(应激)条件下,与仅固定而未接受电针或艾灸刺激的动物相比,后肢穴位电针或腹部穴位艾灸显著增强了胃排空(P<0.02)以及肠道蠕动。我们得出结论,在约束诱导应激的大鼠中,不同穴位和刺激方式(电刺激与艾灸)对胃肠动力的影响并不一致,并讨论了这些差异背后不同的神经通路。