Munneke M, de Jong Z, Zwinderman A H, Ronday H K, van den Ende C H M, Vliet Vlieland T P M, Hazes J M W
Leiden University Medical Centre, St Radboud, Department of Physiotherapy (326), PO Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Ann Rheum Dis. 2004 Jul;63(7):804-8. doi: 10.1136/ard.2003.011189.
To examine the outcome expectations of RA patients, rheumatologists, and physiotherapists regarding high intensity exercise programmes compared with conventional exercise programmes.
An exercise outcome expectations questionnaire was administered to 807 RA patients, 153 rheumatologists, and 624 physiotherapists. The questionnaire consisted of four statements regarding positive and negative outcomes of high intensity exercise programmes and four similar statements for conventional exercise programmes. A total expectation score for both conventional and high intensity exercise was calculated, ranging from -2 (very negative expectation) to 2 (very positive expectation).
The questionnaire was returned by 662 RA patients (82%), 132 rheumatologists (86%), and 467 physiotherapists (75%). The mean (95% confidence interval) scores for high intensity exercise programmes were 0.30 (0.25 to 0.34), 0.68 (0.62 to 0.74), and -0.06 (-0.15 to 0.02), and for conventional exercise programmes were 0.99 (0.96 to 1.02), 1.13 (1.09 to 1.17), and 1.27 (1.21 to 1.34) for RA patients, rheumatologists, and physiotherapists, respectively. In all three respondent groups, the outcome expectations of high intensity exercise were significantly less positive than those of conventional exercise programme.
Despite the existing evidence regarding the effectiveness and safety of high intensity exercise programmes, RA patients, rheumatologists, and physiotherapists have more positive expectations of conventional exercise programmes than of high intensity exercise programmes. Physiotherapists were the least positive about outcomes of high intensity exercise programmes while rheumatologists were the most positive. To help the implementation of new insights in the effectiveness of physical therapy modalities in rheumatology, the need for continuous education of patients, rheumatologists and physiotherapists is emphasised.
比较类风湿关节炎(RA)患者、风湿病学家和物理治疗师对高强度运动计划与传统运动计划的结果期望。
对807名RA患者、153名风湿病学家和624名物理治疗师进行了运动结果期望问卷调查。问卷包括四条关于高强度运动计划正负结果的陈述以及四条关于传统运动计划的类似陈述。计算了传统运动和高强度运动的总体期望得分,范围从-2(非常消极的期望)到2(非常积极的期望)。
662名RA患者(82%)、132名风湿病学家(86%)和467名物理治疗师(75%)返回了问卷。高强度运动计划的平均(95%置信区间)得分分别为0.30(0.25至0.34)、0.68(0.62至0.74)和-0.06(-0.15至0.02),传统运动计划的得分分别为0.99(0.96至1.02)、1.13(1.09至1.17)和1.27(1.21至1.34),分别针对RA患者、风湿病学家和物理治疗师。在所有三个应答组中,高强度运动的结果期望明显不如传统运动计划积极。
尽管有关于高强度运动计划有效性和安全性的现有证据,但RA患者、风湿病学家和物理治疗师对传统运动计划的期望比对高强度运动计划的期望更积极。物理治疗师对高强度运动计划的结果最不乐观,而风湿病学家最乐观。为了帮助在风湿病物理治疗方式有效性方面实施新的见解,强调了对患者、风湿病学家和物理治疗师进行持续教育的必要性。