Suppr超能文献

男性和女性进行较重负荷与较轻负荷的孤立腰椎伸展抗阻运动时的疲劳和感知反应。

Fatigue and perceptual responses of heavier- and lighter-load isolated lumbar extension resistance exercise in males and females.

作者信息

Stuart Charlotte, Steele James, Gentil Paulo, Giessing Jürgen, Fisher James P

机构信息

School of Sport, Health and Social Sciences, Southampton Solent University, United Kingdom.

Faculty of Physical Education and Dance, Universidade Federal de Goiás, Brazil.

出版信息

PeerJ. 2018 Mar 16;6:e4523. doi: 10.7717/peerj.4523. eCollection 2018.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is a lack of research considering acute fatigue responses to high- and low-load resistance training as well as the comparison between male and female responses. Furthermore, limited studies have considered fatigue response testing with the inclusion of perceptions of discomfort and exertion.

METHODS

The present study included males ( = 9; 23.8 ± 6.4 years; 176.7 ± 6.2 cm; 73.9 ± 9.3 kg) and females ( = 8; 21.3 ± 0.9 years; 170.5 ± 6.1 cm; 65.5 ± 10.8 kg) who were assessed for differences in fatigue (i.e., loss of torque at maximal voluntary contraction (MVC)) immediately following isolated lumbar extension (ILEX) exercise at heavy- (HL) and light-(LL) loads (80% and 50% MVC, respectively). Participants also reported perceptual measures of effort (RPE-E) and discomfort (RPE-D) between different resistance training protocols.

RESULTS

Analysis of variance revealed significantly greater absolute and relative fatigue following LL compared to HL conditions ( < 0.001). Absolute fatigue significantly differed between males and females ( = 0.012), though relative fatigue was not significantly different ( = 0.160). However, effect sizes for absolute fatigue (HL; Males = -1.84, Females = -0.83; LL; Males = -3.11, Females = -2.39) and relative fatigue (HL; Males = -2.17, Females = -0.76; LL; Males = -3.36, Females = -3.08) were larger for males in both HL and LL conditions. RPE-E was maximal for all participants in both conditions, but RPE-D was significantly higher in LL compared to HL ( < 0.001) with no difference between males and females.

DISCUSSION

Our data suggests that females do not incur the same degree of fatigue as males following similar exercise protocols, and indeed that females might be able to sustain longer exercise duration at the same relative loads. As such females should manipulate training variables accordingly, perhaps performing greater repetitions at a relative load, or using heavier relative loads than males. Furthermore, since lighter load exercise is often prescribed in rehabilitation settings (particularly for the lumbar extensors) it seems prudent to know that this might not be necessary to strengthen musculature and indeed might be contraindicated to avoid the increased fatigue and discomfort associated with LL exercise.

摘要

背景

目前缺乏关于高负荷和低负荷抗阻训练急性疲劳反应以及男女反应差异的研究。此外,仅有有限的研究在疲劳反应测试中纳入了不适和用力感知因素。

方法

本研究纳入了男性(n = 9;年龄23.8 ± 6.4岁;身高176.7 ± 6.2厘米;体重73.9 ± 9.3千克)和女性(n = 8;年龄21.3 ± 0.9岁;身高170.5 ± 6.1厘米;体重65.5 ± 10.8千克),评估他们在进行重负荷(HL)和轻负荷(LL)(分别为最大自主收缩(MVC)的80%和50%)的孤立腰椎伸展(ILEX)运动后立即出现的疲劳差异(即最大自主收缩时扭矩的损失)。参与者还报告了不同抗阻训练方案之间的用力感知(RPE-E)和不适感知(RPE-D)。

结果

方差分析显示,与HL条件相比,LL条件下的绝对和相对疲劳程度显著更高(P < 0.001)。男性和女性之间的绝对疲劳存在显著差异(P = 0.012),尽管相对疲劳没有显著差异(P = 0.160)。然而,在HL和LL条件下,男性的绝对疲劳(HL;男性=-1.84,女性=-0.83;LL;男性=-3.11,女性=-2.39)和相对疲劳(HL;男性=-2.17,女性=-0.76;LL;男性=-3.36,女性=-3.08)的效应量更大。在两种条件下,所有参与者的RPE-E均达到最大值,但LL条件下的RPE-D显著高于HL条件(P < 0.001),且男性和女性之间无差异。

讨论

我们的数据表明,在进行相似的运动方案后,女性产生的疲劳程度与男性不同,实际上女性在相同相对负荷下可能能够维持更长的运动时间。因此,女性应相应地调整训练变量,或许可以在相对负荷下进行更多次数的练习,或者使用比男性更大的相对负荷。此外,由于在康复环境中通常会规定进行较轻负荷的运动(特别是针对腰椎伸肌),了解到这可能并非增强肌肉组织所必需,实际上可能因避免与LL运动相关的疲劳和不适增加而被视为禁忌,这似乎是明智的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2bac/5858602/907a76b39281/peerj-06-4523-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验