Suppr超能文献

南非夸夸地区针对散养乡村鸡群进行新城疫疫苗接种的不同方法。

Different approaches to the vaccination of free ranging village chickens against Newcastle disease in Qwa-Qwa, South Africa.

作者信息

Thekisoe M M O, Mbati P A, Bisschop S P R

机构信息

Parasitology Research Program, Department of Zoology and Entomology, Faculty of Natural and Agricultural Sciences, University of the Free State, Qwa-Qwa Campus, Private Bag X13, Phuthaditjhaba 9866, South Africa.

出版信息

Vet Microbiol. 2004 Jun 10;101(1):23-30. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2004.03.011.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to develop a strategy to control Newcastle disease (ND) in free ranging village chickens using the Nobilis ND Inkukhu vaccine (Intervet South Africa). The study was conducted at Thibella village in Qwa-Qwa, South Africa from April 2001 to October 2002. Three different routes of vaccination (administration via eye-drop, drinking water and feed) were investigated. The haemagglutination inhibition (HI) test was conducted monthly in order to measure the antibody response of village chickens after immunization against Newcastle disease. Using a South African isolate of velogenic ND virus, challenge trials were conducted to determine the efficacy of the vaccine. A questionnaire was provided to evaluate perceptions of farmers on vaccinations. The eye-drop vaccination route produced the highest HI titres ranging between 2.7 and 4.4, followed by the drinking water vaccination route with titres ranging between 2.3 and 4.0. The lowest titres were from the feed vaccination route which ranged between 1.6 and 3.0. Following the challenge, the entire control group died on the third and fourth day after infection. However, 70% of the chickens immunized by using either the eye-drop or drinking water route survived the challenge. Only 20% of the chickens from the group immunized through the feed route survived. Evidently both the eye-drop and drinking water routes were efficient in preventing disease. Necropsies showed that vaccinated chickens had mild lesions whilst control chickens had severe lesions compatible with Newcastle disease. The efficacy of the vaccine using either of the routes can be enhanced by administration of booster vaccinations at 3-month intervals during the first year of a vaccination campaign and then at 6-month intervals from the second year onwards. The majority of the owners indicated that they would prefer to vaccinate their flocks using the drinking water route.

摘要

本研究的目的是制定一项战略,使用诺比里斯新城疫因库胡疫苗(南非英特威公司生产)来控制散养村鸡的新城疫。该研究于2001年4月至2002年10月在南非夸夸的蒂贝拉村进行。研究调查了三种不同的疫苗接种途径(滴眼、饮水和饲料投喂)。每月进行血凝抑制(HI)试验,以测定村鸡免疫新城疫后的抗体反应。使用南非强毒新城疫病毒分离株进行攻毒试验,以确定疫苗的效力。提供了一份问卷,以评估农民对疫苗接种的看法。滴眼接种途径产生的HI效价最高,在2.7至4.4之间,其次是饮水接种途径,效价在2.3至4.0之间。最低效价来自饲料接种途径,在1.6至3.0之间。攻毒后,整个对照组在感染后的第三天和第四天死亡。然而,通过滴眼或饮水途径免疫的鸡中有70%在攻毒中存活。通过饲料途径免疫的鸡群中只有20%存活。显然,滴眼和饮水途径在预防疾病方面都很有效。尸检显示,接种疫苗的鸡有轻度病变,而对照鸡有与新城疫相符的严重病变。在疫苗接种运动的第一年,每隔三个月进行一次加强免疫,从第二年起每隔六个月进行一次加强免疫,可以提高使用任何一种途径接种疫苗的效力。大多数鸡主表示,他们更愿意通过饮水途径为鸡群接种疫苗。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验