Ogolla Kennedy O, Anyona Douglas N, Chemuliti Judith K, Kimani Winnie W, King'oo Francisca M, Waweru Kennedy M, Omia Dalmas O, Nyamongo Isaac K, Bukachi Salome A
Biotechnology Research Institute, Kenya Agricultural and Livestock Research Organization, Kikuyu, Kenya.
Institute of Anthropology, Gender and African Studies, University of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya.
PLoS One. 2024 Aug 1;19(8):e0308088. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0308088. eCollection 2024.
In the absence of effective drugs, vaccines constitute the cornerstone for the prevention of Newcastle disease (ND). Different strategies have been implemented to increase vaccination, but uptake remains low, underscoring the need for novel vaccine delivery methods. We designed and assessed the effectiveness of a community-centered ND vaccine delivery model in southeastern Kenya. Under the model, we sensitized smallholder chicken farmers (SCFs) through structured training on chicken husbandry, biosecurity, ND, and its vaccination, among other aspects. We subsequently engaged trained community vaccinators (CVs) to deliver vaccines and/or provide vaccination services to SCFs at a cost on one hand and, at no cost on the other, in selected sites to address challenges of inadequate service providers, vaccine unavailability, and inaccessibility. We tested this model under paid and free vaccination frameworks over one year and assessed the model's effect on vaccine uptake, ND-related deaths, and vaccine accessibility, among other aspects. Overall, we vaccinated more chickens at free sites compared to paid sites. However, we vaccinated a significantly higher mean number of chickens per household at paid (49.4±38.5) compared to free (28.4±25.9) sites (t = 8.4, p<0.0001). We recorded a significant increase in the proportion of SCFs who vaccinated their chickens from 31.3% to 68.4% (χ2(1, N = 399) = 58.3, p<0.0001) in paid and from 19.9% to 74.9% (χ2(1, N = 403) = 115.7, p<0.0001) in free sites pre- and post-intervention, respectively. The mean number of ND-related deaths reported per household decreased from 18.1±31.6 pre-intervention to 7.5±22.3 post-intervention (t = 5.4, p = 0.000), with higher reductions recorded in paid sites (20.9±37.7 to 4.5±11.2) compared to free sites (15.0±22.6 to 10.7±29.7) pre- and post-intervention, respectively. Farmers with access to vaccines increased significantly from 61.1% to 85.4% (χ2(1, N = 399) = 31.7, p<0.0001) in paid and 43.6% to 74.9% (χ2(1, N = 403) = 38.4, p = 0.0001) in free sites pre- and post-intervention, respectively. We established that type of intervention framework, gender of household head, if the household head attended training on chicken production in the last 12 months, access to information on ND vaccination, and the number of chickens lost to the previous ND outbreak were significant predictors of ND vaccine uptake. Our findings indicate the model has a broader reach and benefits for SCFs. However, policies should be enacted to regulate the integration of CVs into the formal animal health sector.
在缺乏有效药物的情况下,疫苗是预防新城疫(ND)的基石。人们已经实施了不同策略来提高疫苗接种率,但接种率仍然很低,这突出表明需要新的疫苗接种方法。我们设计并评估了肯尼亚东南部一种以社区为中心的新城疫疫苗接种模式的有效性。在该模式下,我们通过对小农户养鸡户(SCFs)进行关于养鸡、生物安全、新城疫及其疫苗接种等方面的结构化培训来提高他们的认识。随后,我们聘请经过培训的社区疫苗接种员(CVs)一方面以收费方式为小农户养鸡户提供疫苗和/或接种服务,另一方面在选定地点免费提供,以应对服务提供者不足、疫苗供应短缺和难以获取等挑战。我们在付费和免费接种框架下对该模式进行了为期一年的测试,并评估了该模式在疫苗接种率、与新城疫相关的死亡以及疫苗可及性等方面的效果。总体而言,与付费地点相比,我们在免费地点接种的鸡更多。然而,与免费地点(28.4±25.9)相比,付费地点(49.4±38.5)每户接种鸡的平均数量显著更高(t = 8.4,p<0.0001)。在干预前和干预后,付费地点接种鸡的小农户养鸡户比例从31.3%显著增加到68.4%(χ2(1, N = 399) = 58.3,p<0.0001),免费地点从19.9%增加到74.9%(χ2(1, N = 403) = 115.7,p<0.0001)。每户报告的与新城疫相关的死亡平均数量从干预前的18.1±31.6降至干预后的7.5±22.3(t = 5.4,p = 0.000),与免费地点(干预前15.0±22.6至干预后10.7±29.7)相比,付费地点(干预前20.9±37.7至干预后4.5±11.2)的降幅更大。在干预前和干预后,付费地点能够获取疫苗的农户从61.1%显著增加到85.4%(χ2(1, N = 399) = 31.7,p<0.0001),免费地点从43.6%增加到74.9%(χ2(1, N = 403) = 38.4,p = 0.0001)。我们确定干预框架类型、户主性别、户主在过去12个月内是否参加过养鸡生产培训、获取新城疫疫苗接种信息的情况以及因之前新城疫疫情损失的鸡的数量是新城疫疫苗接种的重要预测因素。我们的研究结果表明该模式对小农户养鸡户具有更广泛的覆盖范围和益处。然而,应制定政策来规范将社区疫苗接种员纳入正规动物卫生部门的工作。