Bock Beth, Graham Amanda, Sciamanna Christopher, Krishnamoorthy Jenelle, Whiteley Jessica, Carmona-Barros Rosa, Niaura Raymond, Abrams David
Centers for Behavioral and Preventive Medicine, Brown Medical School and The Miriam Hospital, Providence RI 02903, USA.
Nicotine Tob Res. 2004 Apr;6(2):207-19. doi: 10.1080/14622200410001676332.
The explosive growth in access to the Internet suggests that the Internet may be a viable channel through which we can reach and treat the large population of smokers who are unlikely to use other modes of intervention. We applied national guidelines from the U.S. Public Health Service to assess the quality of interventions for smoking cessation that are available on the Internet. The Public Health Service guidelines were codified into two instruments to record and to rate quality of the intervention contents. Usability guidelines established by the National Cancer Institute were used to develop an instrument to assess Web site usability. Of the 202 Web sites identified in searches, 77% did not provide direct intervention over the Internet and were excluded from analyses. A total of 46 Web sites were included in our review. Usability assessments showed mixed results. Web sites were visually well organized and used consistent graphical design; however, reading difficulty averaged above the 8th-grade level. Over 80% of Web sites provided no coverage of one or more of the key components of tobacco treatment recommended in the guidelines. Ironically, areas receiving the least coverage were those most amenable to the interactive capabilities of the Internet, such as providing tailored, personalized advice to quit and arranging follow-up contact. Smokers seeking quality tobacco dependence treatment on the Internet may have difficulty distinguishing among the numerous Web sites available. Web sites that provide direct treatment often fail to fully implement treatment guidelines and do not take full advantage of the interactive and tailoring capabilities of the Internet.
互联网接入的迅猛增长表明,互联网可能是一个可行的渠道,通过它我们可以接触并治疗大量不太可能采用其他干预方式的吸烟者。我们应用了美国公共卫生服务局的国家指南来评估互联网上可获取的戒烟干预措施的质量。公共卫生服务局的指南被编纂成两种工具,用于记录和评估干预内容的质量。美国国家癌症研究所制定的可用性指南被用于开发一种评估网站可用性的工具。在搜索中识别出的202个网站中,77%没有通过互联网提供直接干预,因此被排除在分析之外。我们共审查了46个网站。可用性评估结果不一。网站在视觉上组织良好,采用了一致的图形设计;然而,阅读难度平均高于八年级水平。超过80%的网站没有涵盖指南中推荐 的烟草治疗的一个或多个关键组成部分。具有讽刺意味的是,覆盖最少的领域恰恰是那些最适合互联网互动功能的领域,比如提供量身定制的个性化戒烟建议以及安排后续联系。在互联网上寻求高质量烟草依赖治疗的吸烟者可能难以区分众多可用的网站。提供直接治疗的网站往往未能充分实施治疗指南,也没有充分利用互联网的互动和定制功能。