Lynch Deirdre C, Surdyk Patricia M, Eiser Arnold R
Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education, Chicago, IL, USA.
Med Teach. 2004 Jun;26(4):366-73. doi: 10.1080/01421590410001696434.
Although assessing professionalism poses many challenges, gauging and detecting changes in professionalism is impossible without measurement. This paper is a review of techniques used to assess professionalism during the past 20 years. The authors searched five electronic databases and reference lists from 1982 to 2002. Eighty-eight assessments were retained and organized into content area addressed (i.e. ethics, personal characteristics, comprehensive professionalism, diversity) and type of outcome examined (i.e. affective, cognitive, behavioral, environmental). Instead of creating new professionalism assessments, existing assessments should be improved. Also, more studies on the predictive validity of assessments and their use as part of formative evaluation systems are recommended. Based on the review, suggestions are presented for assessing medical students, resident physicians and practicing physicians.
尽管评估职业素养面临诸多挑战,但如果没有衡量标准,就无法评估和检测职业素养的变化。本文回顾了过去20年用于评估职业素养的技术。作者检索了1982年至2002年的五个电子数据库和参考文献列表。保留了88项评估,并按照所涉及的内容领域(即伦理、个人特质、综合职业素养、多样性)和所考察的结果类型(即情感、认知、行为、环境)进行了整理。不应创建新的职业素养评估,而应改进现有的评估。此外,建议开展更多关于评估预测效度及其作为形成性评价系统一部分的应用的研究。基于该综述,针对医学生、住院医师和执业医师的评估提出了建议。