Le Pelley M E
School of Psychology, Cardiff University, Cardiff, Wales, UK.
Q J Exp Psychol B. 2004 Jul;57(3):193-243. doi: 10.1080/02724990344000141.
Associative learning theories strive to capture the processes underlying and driving the change in strength of the associations between representations of stimuli that develop as a result of experience of the predictive relationships between those stimuli. Historically, formal models of associative learning have focused on two potential factors underlying associative change, namely processing of the conditioned stimulus (in terms of changes in associability) and processing of the unconditioned stimulus (in terms of changes in error). This review constitutes an analysis of the proper role of these two factors, specifically with regard to the way in which they are influenced by associative history (the prior training undergone by cues). A novel "hybrid" model of associative learning is proposed and is shown to provide a more satisfactory account of the effects of associative history on subsequent learning than any previous single-process theory.
联想学习理论致力于捕捉那些因刺激表征之间预测关系的经验而形成的关联强度变化背后的过程及其驱动因素。从历史上看,联想学习的形式模型主要关注联想变化背后的两个潜在因素,即条件刺激的加工(从可联想性的变化方面)和无条件刺激的加工(从误差变化方面)。本综述对这两个因素的恰当作用进行了分析,特别是关于它们如何受到联想历史(线索所经历的先前训练)影响的方式。本文提出了一种新颖的联想学习“混合”模型,并表明该模型比以往任何单一过程理论都能更令人满意地解释联想历史对后续学习的影响。