Weber Michael A, Julius Stevo, Kjeldsen Sverre E, Brunner Hans R, Ekman Steffan, Hansson Lennart, Hua Tsushung, Laragh John H, McInnes Gordon T, Mitchell Lada, Plat Francis, Schork M Anthony, Smith Beverly, Zanchetti Alberto
State University of New York, Brooklyn, NY, USA.
Lancet. 2004 Jun 19;363(9426):2049-51. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16456-8.
The Valsartan Antihypertensive Long-term Use Evaluation (VALUE) trial was designed to test whether, for the same achieved blood pressures, regimens based on valsartan or amlodipine would have differing effects on cardiovascular endpoints in high risk hypertension. But inequalities in blood pressure, favouring amlodipine, throughout the multiyear trial precluded comparison of outcomes. A technique of serial median matching, applied at 6 months when treatment adjustments intended to achieve control of blood pressure were complete, created 5006 valsartan-amlodipine patient pairs matched exactly for systolic blood pressure, age, sex, and the presence or absence of previous coronary disease, stroke, or diabetes. Subsequent combined cardiac events, myocardial infarction, stroke, and mortality were almost identical in the two cohorts, but admission to hospital for heart failure was significantly lower with valsartan. Reaching blood pressure control (systolic <140 mm Hg) by 6 months, independent of drug type, was associated with significant benefits for subsequent major outcomes; the blood pressure response after just 1 month of treatment predicted events and survival.
缬沙坦长期抗高血压使用评估(VALUE)试验旨在测试,对于相同的血压控制水平,基于缬沙坦或氨氯地平的治疗方案在高危高血压患者中对心血管终点是否有不同影响。但在整个多年试验中,血压存在有利于氨氯地平的差异,这使得无法比较结果。在治疗调整以实现血压控制完成后的6个月,采用连续中位数匹配技术,创建了5006对缬沙坦-氨氯地平患者配对,这些配对在收缩压、年龄、性别以及既往是否患有冠心病、中风或糖尿病方面完全匹配。随后,两个队列中的合并心脏事件、心肌梗死、中风和死亡率几乎相同,但缬沙坦组因心力衰竭住院的比例显著更低。无论药物类型如何,在6个月时达到血压控制(收缩压<140 mmHg)与随后的主要结局显著获益相关;治疗仅1个月后的血压反应可预测事件和生存情况。