• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Variability of four limb blood pressure in normal neonates.正常新生儿四肢血压的变异性。
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2004 Jul;89(4):F325-7. doi: 10.1136/adc.2003.034322.
2
Normative arm and calf blood pressure values in the newborn.新生儿手臂和小腿血压的正常数值
Pediatrics. 1989 Feb;83(2):240-3.
3
Calf blood pressure: clinical implications and correlations with arm blood pressure in infants and young children.小腿血压:婴幼儿的临床意义及其与手臂血压的相关性
Pediatrics. 1996 Feb;97(2):220-4.
4
Evidence for cardiovascular autonomic dysfunction in neonates with coarctation of the aorta.主动脉缩窄新生儿心血管自主神经功能障碍的证据。
Circulation. 2006 Jun 20;113(24):2844-50. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.602748. Epub 2006 Jun 12.
5
Oscillometric blood pressures in the arm, thigh, and calf in healthy children and those with aortic coarctation.健康儿童及主动脉缩窄患儿手臂、大腿和小腿的示波血压。
Pediatrics. 1993 Apr;91(4):761-5.
6
Comparison of calf and brachial blood pressures in infants: is there a difference between calf and brachial blood pressures?婴儿小腿与肱动脉血压的比较:小腿血压与肱动脉血压之间是否存在差异?
J Vasc Nurs. 2014 Dec;32(4):139-43. doi: 10.1016/j.jvn.2014.03.003. Epub 2014 Nov 15.
7
Comparison of upper arm and calf oscillometric blood pressure measurement in preterm infants.早产儿上臂与小腿示波法血压测量的比较
J Perinatol. 1996 Mar-Apr;16(2 Pt 1):89-92.
8
Reproducibility of measures of visit-to-visit variability in blood pressure after transient ischaemic attack or minor stroke.短暂性脑缺血发作或轻度中风后血压逐次就诊变异性测量的可重复性。
Cerebrovasc Dis. 2009;28(4):331-40. doi: 10.1159/000229551. Epub 2009 Jul 24.
9
Suspicion of aortic coarctation in an outpatient clinic: how should blood pressure measurements be performed?门诊对主动脉缩窄的怀疑:应如何进行血压测量?
Clin Physiol. 2001 Jan;21(1):100-4. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2281.2001.00295.x.
10
Comparison of Dinamap PRO-100 and mercury sphygmomanometer blood pressure measurements in a population-based study.基于人群的研究中 Dinamap PRO - 100 与汞柱式血压计血压测量结果的比较。
Am J Hypertens. 2006 Apr;19(4):353-60. doi: 10.1016/j.amjhyper.2005.10.020.

引用本文的文献

1
[Intraoperative hypotension in children-Measurement and treatment].[儿童术中低血压——测量与治疗]
Anaesthesiologie. 2024 Nov;73(11):724-734. doi: 10.1007/s00101-024-01461-x. Epub 2024 Sep 27.
2
Cardiovascular Sequelae of Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia in Preterm Neonates Born before 32 Weeks of Gestational Age: Impact of Associated Pulmonary and Systemic Hypertension.孕龄小于32周的早产儿支气管肺发育不良的心血管后遗症:合并肺高压和系统性高血压的影响
J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2024 Jul 26;11(8):233. doi: 10.3390/jcdd11080233.
3
Arch watch: current approaches and opportunities for improvement.档案观察:当前的方法及改进机遇
J Perinatol. 2024 Mar;44(3):325-332. doi: 10.1038/s41372-023-01854-7. Epub 2023 Dec 21.
4
Oscillometric arterial blood pressure in haemodynamically stable neonates in the first 2 weeks of life.血流动力学稳定的新生儿在生命的头 2 周内的动脉血压的无创伤性测量。
Pediatr Nephrol. 2023 Oct;38(10):3369-3378. doi: 10.1007/s00467-023-05979-x. Epub 2023 May 5.
5
Clinical, Experimental, and Computational Validation of a New Doppler-Based Index for Coarctation Severity Assessment.临床、实验和计算验证一种新的基于多普勒的缩窄严重程度评估指数。
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2022 Dec;35(12):1311-1321. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2022.09.006. Epub 2022 Sep 17.
6
Management of Acute Kidney Injury in Extremely Low Birth Weight Infants.极低出生体重儿急性肾损伤的管理
Front Pediatr. 2022 Mar 30;10:867715. doi: 10.3389/fped.2022.867715. eCollection 2022.
7
Neonatal hypertension: cases, causes, and clinical approach.新生儿高血压:病例、病因与临床处理方法。
Pediatr Nephrol. 2019 May;34(5):787-799. doi: 10.1007/s00467-018-3977-4. Epub 2018 May 28.
8
Photoplethysmographic waveform characteristics of newborns with coarctation of the aorta.主动脉缩窄新生儿的光电容积脉搏波特征
J Perinatol. 2017 Jan;37(1):77-80. doi: 10.1038/jp.2016.162. Epub 2016 Sep 29.
9
Making a diagnosis of hypertension and defining treatment threshold in very low birth weight infants' need revision?对极低出生体重儿进行高血压诊断并确定治疗阈值是否需要修订?
J Renal Inj Prev. 2016 Jun 1;5(2):55-60. doi: 10.15171/jrip.2016.13. eCollection 2016.
10
Does measurement of four-limb blood pressures at birth improve detection of aortic arch anomalies?出生时测量四肢血压能否改善主动脉弓异常的检测?
J Perinatol. 2016 May;36(5):376-80. doi: 10.1038/jp.2015.203. Epub 2016 Jan 14.

本文引用的文献

1
Flush method for blood pressure determinations in newborn infants.新生儿血压测定的冲洗法
J Pediatr. 1952 Mar;40(3):285-9. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(52)80257-4.
2
The flush method for determining blood pressures in infants. II. Normal values during the first year of life.
Pediatrics. 1958 Jun;21(6):950-7.
3
Temporal variability in birth prevalence of cardiovascular malformations.心血管畸形出生患病率的时间变异性。
Heart. 2000 Apr;83(4):414-9. doi: 10.1136/heart.83.4.414.
4
Comparison of upper arm and calf oscillometric blood pressure measurement in preterm infants.早产儿上臂与小腿示波法血压测量的比较
J Perinatol. 1996 Mar-Apr;16(2 Pt 1):89-92.
5
Systolic blood pressure in a population of infants in the first year of life: the Brompton study.一岁婴儿群体的收缩压:布朗普顿研究
Pediatrics. 1980 May;65(5):1028-35.
6
Indirect BP monitoring in the newborn. Evaluation of a new oscillometer and comparison of upper- and lower-limb measurements.
Am J Dis Child. 1984 Aug;138(8):775-8. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.1984.02140460065021.
7
Difference between upper and lower limb blood pressure in normal neonates using Doppler technique.使用多普勒技术测量正常新生儿上下肢血压的差异。
Arch Dis Child. 1974 Sep;49(9):734-5. doi: 10.1136/adc.49.9.734.
8
Upper- vs lower-limb systolic blood pressure in full-term normal newborns.足月儿正常新生儿上肢与下肢收缩压对比
Am J Dis Child. 1985 Aug;139(8):797-9. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.1985.02140100059030.
9
Blood pressure in full-term healthy neonates.足月健康新生儿的血压
Clin Pediatr (Phila). 1987 Jan;26(1):21-4. doi: 10.1177/000992288702600103.
10
Limitations of Doppler ultrasound in the diagnosis of neonatal coarctation of the aorta.
Int J Cardiol. 1989 Apr;23(1):87-9. doi: 10.1016/0167-5273(89)90333-1.

正常新生儿四肢血压的变异性。

Variability of four limb blood pressure in normal neonates.

作者信息

Crossland D S, Furness J C, Abu-Harb M, Sadagopan S N, Wren C

机构信息

Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne NE7 7DN, UK.

出版信息

Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2004 Jul;89(4):F325-7. doi: 10.1136/adc.2003.034322.

DOI:10.1136/adc.2003.034322
PMID:15210667
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1721730/
Abstract

AIMS

To assess the variation in blood pressure (BP) between limbs in normal neonates. To assess whether comparison of arm and leg BP in neonates is reproducible enough to allow the difference to raise suspicion of coarctation of the aorta.

METHODS

Infants recruited from the postnatal wards and the postnatal murmur clinic underwent echocardiography and BP measurement in each limb using a Dinamap Compact T 482210. The method of BP measurement was guided by a telephone survey of 40 UK neonatal units.

RESULTS

Forty healthy neonates underwent echocardiography and all had a normal aortic arch. BP was measured in 39. In three, BP in the arms was 20 mm Hg higher than in the legs. This gave a specificity of comparison of the upper and lower limb BPs of 92 (36/39) or a false positive rate of 8% (3/39). The standard deviation in BPs was 15.7 mm Hg between arms, 14.5 mm Hg between legs, and 11 mm Hg when the nearest arm and leg were compared.

CONCLUSIONS

With current measurement techniques, normal neonates may have a wide variation in BP between limbs. A difference of 20 mm Hg in isolation is more likely to be due to random variability in measurement than to coarctation of the aorta. If coarctation of the aorta is suspected, it can only be excluded or confirmed by echocardiography.

摘要

目的

评估正常新生儿四肢血压(BP)的差异。评估新生儿手臂与腿部血压的比较是否具有足够的可重复性,以使差异引发对主动脉缩窄的怀疑。

方法

从产后病房和产后杂音诊所招募的婴儿接受了超声心动图检查,并使用Dinamap Compact T 482210测量每个肢体的血压。血压测量方法由对40个英国新生儿病房的电话调查指导。

结果

40名健康新生儿接受了超声心动图检查,所有新生儿的主动脉弓均正常。对39名新生儿进行了血压测量。其中3名新生儿的手臂血压比腿部血压高20 mmHg。上肢与下肢血压比较的特异性为92(36/39),即假阳性率为8%(3/39)。双臂血压的标准差为15.7 mmHg,双腿血压的标准差为14.5 mmHg,最近的手臂与腿部血压比较的标准差为11 mmHg。

结论

采用当前的测量技术,正常新生儿四肢血压可能存在较大差异。单独20 mmHg的差异更可能是由于测量中的随机变异性,而非主动脉缩窄。如果怀疑主动脉缩窄,只能通过超声心动图排除或确诊。