Suppr超能文献

早产儿上臂与小腿示波法血压测量的比较

Comparison of upper arm and calf oscillometric blood pressure measurement in preterm infants.

作者信息

Kunk R, McCain G C

机构信息

Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio 45229-3039, USA.

出版信息

J Perinatol. 1996 Mar-Apr;16(2 Pt 1):89-92.

PMID:8732553
Abstract

Although the practice of using calf blood pressure (BP) measurement is widespread, virtually no information is available about calf site BP measurements in preterm infants. This research compared oscillometric upper arm BP measurements with calf BP measurements in 65 preterm infants with a mean weight of 1629 +/- 437 gm. Differences between arm and calf BP measurements were analyzed with repeated-measures multivariate analysis of variance of systolic, diastolic, and mean arterial pressures. There were no significant differences between arm and calf systolic BP on days 1, 3, and 5 of life. With post hoc testing there was a significant difference on day 7 between systolic arm BP (60.4 +/- 8.4 mm Hg) and calf BP (57.7 +/- 7.1 mm Hg) (t = 3.68, p < 0.01). There were no significant differences between arm and calf measurements for diastolic and mean arterial pressures and no main effect from infant weight on differences between arm and calf BP. It may be reasonable to use either arm or calf BP during the first 5 days of life.

摘要

尽管使用小腿血压(BP)测量的做法很普遍,但实际上几乎没有关于早产儿小腿部位血压测量的信息。本研究比较了65名平均体重为1629±437克的早产儿的示波法上臂血压测量值与小腿血压测量值。采用重复测量的收缩压、舒张压和平均动脉压多变量方差分析来分析手臂和小腿血压测量值之间的差异。在出生后第1天、第3天和第5天,手臂和小腿的收缩压没有显著差异。事后检验显示,在出生后第7天,收缩压方面,上臂血压(60.4±8.4毫米汞柱)与小腿血压(57.7±7.1毫米汞柱)之间存在显著差异(t = 3.68,p < 0.01)。手臂和小腿的舒张压及平均动脉压测量值之间没有显著差异,婴儿体重对手臂和小腿血压差异也没有主要影响。在出生后的前5天使用手臂或小腿血压测量可能都是合理的。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验