Schwarzenbacher Robert, Godzik Adam, Grzechnik Slawomir K, Jaroszewski Lukasz
Bioinformatics Core, Joint Center for Structural Genomics, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA.
Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr. 2004 Jul;60(Pt 7):1229-36. doi: 10.1107/S0907444904010145. Epub 2004 Jun 22.
Many crystallographic protein structures are being determined using molecular replacement (MR), a model-based phasing method that has become increasingly important with the steady growth of the PDB. While there are several highly automated software packages for MR, the methods for preparing optimal search models for MR are relatively unexplored. Recent advances in sequence-comparison methods allow the detection of more distantly related homologs and more accurate alignment of their sequences. It was investigated whether simple homology models (without modeling of unaligned regions) based on alignments from these improved methods are able to increase the potential of MR. 27 crystal structures were determined using a highly parallelized MR pipeline that facilitates all steps including homology detection, model preparation, MR searches, automated refinement and rebuilding. Several types of search models prepared with standard sequence-sequence alignment (BLAST) and more accurate profile-sequence and profile-profile methods (PSI-BLAST, FFAS) were compared in MR trials. The analysis shows that models based on more accurate alignments have a higher success rate in cases where the unknown structure and the search model share less than 35% sequence identity. It is concluded that by using different types of simple models based on accurate alignments, the success rate of MR can be significantly increased.
许多晶体学蛋白质结构是通过分子置换(MR)来确定的,这是一种基于模型的相位确定方法,随着蛋白质数据银行(PDB)的稳步增长,该方法变得越来越重要。虽然有几个用于分子置换的高度自动化软件包,但为分子置换准备最佳搜索模型的方法相对较少被探索。序列比较方法的最新进展使得能够检测到更远缘相关的同源物,并更准确地比对它们的序列。研究了基于这些改进方法比对得到的简单同源模型(不对未比对区域建模)是否能够提高分子置换的成功率。使用高度并行化的分子置换流程确定了27个晶体结构,该流程便于进行包括同源性检测、模型制备、分子置换搜索、自动精修和重建在内的所有步骤。在分子置换试验中比较了用标准序列-序列比对(BLAST)以及更准确的profile-序列和profile-profile方法(PSI-BLAST、FFAS)制备的几种类型的搜索模型。分析表明,在未知结构与搜索模型的序列同一性低于35%的情况下,基于更准确比对的模型具有更高的成功率。得出的结论是,通过使用基于准确比对的不同类型简单模型,可以显著提高分子置换的成功率。