• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

人类配偶选择的演变。

Evolution of human mate choice.

作者信息

Geary David C, Vigil Jacob, Byrd-Craven Jennifer

机构信息

Department of Psychology, 210 McAlester Hall, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211-2500, USA.

出版信息

J Sex Res. 2004 Feb;41(1):27-42. doi: 10.1080/00224490409552211.

DOI:10.1080/00224490409552211
PMID:15216422
Abstract

This article provides a review of evolutionary theory and empirical research on mate choices in nonhuman species and uses it as a frame for understanding the how and why of human mate choices. The basic principle is that the preferred mate choices and attendant social cognitions and behaviors of both women and men, and those of other species, have evolved to focus on and exploit the reproductive potential and reproductive investment of members of the opposite sex. Reproductive potential is defined as the genetic, material, and/or social resources an individual can invest in offspring, and reproductive investment is the actual use of these resources to enhance the physical and social well- being of offspring. Similarities and differences in the mate preferences and choices of women and men are reviewed and can be understood in terms of similarities and differences in the form of reproductive potential that women and men have to offer and their tendency to use this potential for the well-being of children.

摘要

本文回顾了关于非人类物种配偶选择的进化理论和实证研究,并以此为框架来理解人类配偶选择的方式和原因。基本原则是,男性和女性以及其他物种的偏好配偶选择以及随之而来的社会认知和行为,已经进化到专注于并利用异性成员的生殖潜力和生殖投资。生殖潜力被定义为个体可以投资于后代的基因、物质和/或社会资源,而生殖投资是这些资源用于提升后代身体和社会福祉的实际运用。本文还回顾了男性和女性在配偶偏好和选择上的异同,这些异同可以从男性和女性所能提供的生殖潜力形式以及他们为子女福祉利用这种潜力的倾向的异同来理解。

相似文献

1
Evolution of human mate choice.人类配偶选择的演变。
J Sex Res. 2004 Feb;41(1):27-42. doi: 10.1080/00224490409552211.
2
Genetic quality and sexual selection: an integrated framework for good genes and compatible genes.遗传质量与性选择:一个关于优质基因和兼容基因的综合框架。
Mol Ecol. 2005 Jan;14(1):19-38. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2004.02395.x.
3
Ageing, mate preferences and sexuality: a mini-review.衰老、配偶偏好与性行为:一篇综述短文
Gerontology. 2009;55(4):371-8. doi: 10.1159/000203698. Epub 2009 Feb 20.
4
Female competition: causes, constraints, content, and contexts.女性竞争:原因、限制因素、内容及背景
J Sex Res. 2004 Feb;41(1):16-26. doi: 10.1080/00224490409552210.
5
Mate Preferences and Their Behavioral Manifestations.伴侣偏好及其行为表现。
Annu Rev Psychol. 2019 Jan 4;70:77-110. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-103408. Epub 2018 Sep 19.
6
The sexuality connection in reproductive health.生殖健康中的性方面联系。
Stud Fam Plann. 1993 Sep-Oct;24(5):269-82.
7
Sexual selection and mate choice.性选择与配偶选择
Trends Ecol Evol. 2006 Jun;21(6):296-302. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2006.03.015. Epub 2006 Apr 3.
8
Stepping out of the caveman's shadow: nations' gender gap predicts degree of sex differentiation in mate preferences.走出穴居人的阴影:国家性别差距预测择偶偏好性别差异程度。
Psychol Sci. 2012 Oct 1;23(10):1176-85. doi: 10.1177/0956797612441004. Epub 2012 Aug 29.
9
Sexual selection with a culturally transmitted mating preference.具有文化传播交配偏好的性选择。
Theor Popul Biol. 1994 Feb;45(1):1-15. doi: 10.1006/tpbi.1994.1001.
10
The effects of a parenting prime on sex differences in mate selection criteria.育儿启动对配偶选择标准中性别差异的影响。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2006 Nov;32(11):1459-68. doi: 10.1177/0146167206291340.

引用本文的文献

1
Modulation of strategic status signaling: oxytocin changes men's fluctuations of status products preferences in their female partners' menstrual cycle.策略性地位信号的调节:催产素改变男性在其女性伴侣月经周期中对地位相关产品偏好的波动。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2025 Apr 14. doi: 10.1007/s00213-025-06783-1.
2
Hypergamy reconsidered: Marriage in England, 1837-2021.对攀附婚姻的重新审视:1837年至2021年的英格兰婚姻
PLoS One. 2025 Feb 3;20(2):e0316769. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0316769. eCollection 2025.
3
Testing Sexual Strategy Theory in Norway.
在挪威检验性策略理论。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2024 May 24;14(6):438. doi: 10.3390/bs14060438.
4
Condition-dependent trade-offs maintain honest signalling.条件依赖性权衡维持诚实信号传递。
R Soc Open Sci. 2022 Oct 5;9(10):220335. doi: 10.1098/rsos.220335. eCollection 2022 Oct.
5
Individual's Reproductive Strategies Moderates the Association Between Facial Width-to-Height and Risk-Taking Propensity.个体的生殖策略调节了面部宽高比与冒险倾向之间的关系。
Evol Psychol. 2022 Jul-Sep;20(3):14747049221096758. doi: 10.1177/14747049221096758.
6
Too Many Males or Too Many Females? Classroom Sex Ratio, Life History Strategies and Risk-Taking Behaviors.男生过多还是女生过多?课堂性别比例、生活史策略与冒险行为。
J Youth Adolesc. 2022 Oct;51(10):2033-2045. doi: 10.1007/s10964-022-01635-z. Epub 2022 Jun 1.
7
Are -infected subjects more attractive, symmetrical, or healthier than non-infected ones? Evidence from subjective and objective measurements.感染过的个体比未感染的个体更有吸引力、更对称或更健康吗?来自主观和客观测量的证据。
PeerJ. 2022 Mar 25;10:e13122. doi: 10.7717/peerj.13122. eCollection 2022.
8
The Peacock Fallacy: Art as a Veblenian Signal.孔雀谬误:作为凡勃伦式信号的艺术
Front Psychol. 2021 Nov 22;12:767409. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.767409. eCollection 2021.
9
Does Nubility Indicate More Than High Reproductive Value? Nubile Primiparas' Pregnancy Outcomes in Evolutionary Perspective.青春期是否意味着更高的生殖价值?从进化角度看生育旺盛期初产妇的妊娠结局。
Evol Psychol. 2021 Jul-Sep;19(3):14747049211039506. doi: 10.1177/14747049211039506.
10
Women's Preferences for Strong Men Under Perceived Harsh Versus Safe Ecological Conditions.女性在感知到恶劣和安全的生态条件下对强壮男性的偏好。
Evol Psychol. 2021 Jul-Sep;19(3):14747049211032351. doi: 10.1177/14747049211032351.