• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

走出穴居人的阴影:国家性别差距预测择偶偏好性别差异程度。

Stepping out of the caveman's shadow: nations' gender gap predicts degree of sex differentiation in mate preferences.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of York, York, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Psychol Sci. 2012 Oct 1;23(10):1176-85. doi: 10.1177/0956797612441004. Epub 2012 Aug 29.

DOI:10.1177/0956797612441004
PMID:22933455
Abstract

An influential explanation for gender differences in mating strategies is that the sex-specific reproductive constraints faced by human ancestors shaped these differences. Other theorists have emphasized the role of societal factors, hypothesizing, for example, that gender differences in mate preferences should wane in gender-equal societies. However, findings have been ambiguous. Using recent data and a novel measure of gender equality, we revisited the role of gender parity in gender differentiation for mate preferences. In the first study, 3,177 participants from 10 nations with a gradually decreasing Global Gender Gap Index (GGI) provided online ratings of the desirability of mate attributes with reportedly evolutionary origins. In the second study, GGI scores were related to gender differences in mate preferences previously reported for 8,953 participants from 31 nations (Buss, 1989). Both studies show that gender differences in mate preferences with presumed evolutionary roots decline proportionally to increases in nations' gender parity.

摘要

一种有影响力的解释是,人类祖先所面临的性别特异性生殖限制塑造了这些性别在交配策略上的差异。其他理论家则强调了社会因素的作用,例如假设性别偏好中的性别差异在性别平等的社会中应该会减弱。然而,研究结果一直存在争议。我们使用最新的数据和一种新的性别平等衡量标准,重新研究了性别平等在性别偏好的性别差异中的作用。在第一项研究中,来自 10 个国家的 3177 名参与者,这些国家的全球性别差距指数(GGI)逐渐降低,他们在线评估了具有进化起源的伴侣属性的吸引力。在第二项研究中,GGI 得分与此前为来自 31 个国家的 8953 名参与者报告的性别偏好中的性别差异相关(Buss,1989)。这两项研究都表明,具有假定进化根源的性别偏好中的性别差异与国家性别平等程度的提高成比例地下降。

相似文献

1
Stepping out of the caveman's shadow: nations' gender gap predicts degree of sex differentiation in mate preferences.走出穴居人的阴影:国家性别差距预测择偶偏好性别差异程度。
Psychol Sci. 2012 Oct 1;23(10):1176-85. doi: 10.1177/0956797612441004. Epub 2012 Aug 29.
2
When the difference is in the details: a critique of Zentner and Mitura (2012) "Stepping out of the caveman's shadow: Nations' gender gap predicts degree of sex differentiation in mate preferences".当差异体现在细节中:对曾特纳和米图拉(2012年)《走出穴居人的阴影:国家的性别差距预测择偶偏好中的性别分化程度》的评论
Evol Psychol. 2012 Oct 29;10(4):720-6. doi: 10.1177/147470491201000406.
3
How Sexually Dimorphic Are Human Mate Preferences?人类的择偶偏好有多大的性别差异?
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2015 Aug;41(8):1082-93. doi: 10.1177/0146167215590987. Epub 2015 Jun 11.
4
Evolution of human mate choice.人类配偶选择的演变。
J Sex Res. 2004 Feb;41(1):27-42. doi: 10.1080/00224490409552211.
5
The role of ego-identity status in mating preferences.自我认同状态在择偶偏好中的作用。
Adolescence. 2005 Fall;40(159):489-501.
6
Patterns and universals of mate poaching across 53 nations: the effects of sex, culture, and personality on romantically attracting another person's partner.53个国家配偶偷猎的模式与普遍性:性别、文化和个性对浪漫吸引他人伴侣的影响。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2004 Apr;86(4):560-84. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.86.4.560.
7
Homosexual mating preferences from an evolutionary perspective: sexual selection theory revisited.从进化角度看同性恋的交配偏好:重探性选择理论
Arch Sex Behav. 2007 Oct;36(5):717-23. doi: 10.1007/s10508-007-9216-x. Epub 2007 Aug 3.
8
Characteristics of the ideal sex partner: gender differences and perceptions of the preferences of the other gender.理想性伴侣的特征:性别差异及对另一性别的偏好认知
J Sex Marital Ther. 2000 Apr-Jun;26(2):153-9. doi: 10.1080/009262300278551.
9
Mate Preferences and Their Behavioral Manifestations.伴侣偏好及其行为表现。
Annu Rev Psychol. 2019 Jan 4;70:77-110. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-103408. Epub 2018 Sep 19.
10
The evolutionary psychology of facial beauty.面部美的进化心理学
Annu Rev Psychol. 2006;57:199-226. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190208.

引用本文的文献

1
Simpson's gender-equality paradox.辛普森性别平等悖论。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2025 Jun 10;122(23):e2422247122. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2422247122. Epub 2025 Jun 5.
2
Hypergamy reconsidered: Marriage in England, 1837-2021.对攀附婚姻的重新审视:1837年至2021年的英格兰婚姻
PLoS One. 2025 Feb 3;20(2):e0316769. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0316769. eCollection 2025.
3
Testing Sexual Strategy Theory in Norway.在挪威检验性策略理论。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2024 May 24;14(6):438. doi: 10.3390/bs14060438.
4
A Systematic Review and New Analyses of the Gender-Equality Paradox.性别平等悖论的系统评价与新分析
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2025 May;20(3):503-539. doi: 10.1177/17456916231202685. Epub 2024 Jan 3.
5
Female Mate Choice : A Comparison Between Accept-the-Best and Reject-the-Worst Strategies in Sequential Decision Making.雌性配偶选择:顺序决策中“接受最佳”与“拒绝最差”策略的比较
Evol Psychol. 2015 Sep 1;13(3):1474704915594553. doi: 10.1177/1474704915594553.
6
The Role of Vision in the Emergence of Mate Preferences.视觉在配偶偏好形成中的作用。
Arch Sex Behav. 2021 Nov;50(8):3785-3797. doi: 10.1007/s10508-020-01901-w. Epub 2021 Apr 13.
7
Sexual Selection and the Evolution of Human Appearance Enhancements.性选择与人类外貌特征的进化
Arch Sex Behav. 2022 Jan;51(1):49-55. doi: 10.1007/s10508-021-01946-5. Epub 2021 Mar 15.
8
Sex and gender differences in childhood obesity: contributing to the research agenda.儿童肥胖中的性别差异:对研究议程的推动作用
BMJ Nutr Prev Health. 2020 Sep 9;3(2):387-390. doi: 10.1136/bmjnph-2020-000074. eCollection 2020 Dec.
9
The Gender Cliff in the Relative Contribution to the Household Income: Insights from Modelling Marriage Markets in 27 European Countries.家庭收入相对贡献中的性别差距:来自对27个欧洲国家婚姻市场建模的见解。
Eur J Popul. 2020 Jan 10;36(4):711-733. doi: 10.1007/s10680-019-09547-8. eCollection 2020 Sep.
10
Genesis or Evolution of Gender Differences? Worldview-Based Dilemmas in The Processing of Scientific Information.性别差异的起源还是进化?科学信息处理中基于世界观的困境。
J Cogn. 2020 Apr 30;3(1):9. doi: 10.5334/joc.99.