Suppr超能文献

术前静脉注射咪达唑仑:除抗焦虑作用外的益处。

Preoperative intravenous midazolam: benefits beyond anxiolysis.

作者信息

Bauer Kevin P, Dom Patrick M, Ramirez Antonio M, O'Flaherty Jennifer E

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA 22908, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Anesth. 2004 May;16(3):177-83. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2003.07.003.

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effect of midazolam on the global perioperative experience, including patient satisfaction, postoperative nausea and vomiting, postoperative pain, and perioperative anxiety and amnesia.

DESIGN

Prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled study.

SETTING

Ambulatory surgical center affiliated with a tertiary-care hospital.

PATIENTS

88 ASA physical status I, II, and III patients scheduled for outpatient surgery.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients were randomized into two groups to receive either 0.04 mg/kg of midazolam or placebo intravenously (IV) 20 minutes preoperatively.

MEASUREMENTS

Perioperative measurements included blood pressure, heart rate, and oxygen saturation and the patient's level of anxiety; type of anesthetic administered; the anesthesiologist's guess at the treatment arm; perioperative dosages of fentanyl, morphine, and ondansetron; recovery room length of stay; frequency of nausea and vomiting, and level of postoperative pain in the 24 hours after surgery; the patient's overall satisfaction with the anesthetic, and whether the patient would recommend the premedication to a friend.

MAIN RESULTS

Patient demographics, type of surgery/anesthesia, vital signs, case duration, recovery duration, and postoperative pain were all similar between the midazolam and placebo groups. As expected, IV midazolam was an effective anxiolytic. There was no evidence of retrograde amnesia. Fewer patients in the midazolam group suffered from postoperative nausea than did those in the placebo group (25%vs. 50%;p = 0.03), despite receiving similar perioperative antiemetic and opioid administration. Similarly, fewer patients in the midazolam group experienced postoperative vomiting than placebo group patients (8%vs. 21%), although this difference did not reach statistical significance. Only 42% of patients in the placebo group would recommend their premedication to a friend, compared with 85% of patients in the midazolam group (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In addition to the known anxiolytic effects of midazolam, midazolam premedication is an effective way to reduce the frequency of postoperative nausea, and perhaps vomiting, and increase patient satisfaction.

摘要

研究目的

评估咪达唑仑对围手术期整体体验的影响,包括患者满意度、术后恶心呕吐、术后疼痛以及围手术期焦虑和遗忘。

设计

前瞻性、随机、安慰剂对照研究。

地点

一家三级护理医院附属的门诊手术中心。

患者

88例拟行门诊手术的ASA身体状况为I、II和III级的患者。

干预措施

患者被随机分为两组,在术前20分钟静脉注射0.04mg/kg咪达唑仑或安慰剂。

测量指标

围手术期测量指标包括血压、心率、血氧饱和度以及患者的焦虑程度;所使用的麻醉类型;麻醉医生对治疗组的猜测;芬太尼、吗啡和昂丹司琼的围手术期用量;恢复室停留时间;恶心呕吐频率以及术后24小时内的术后疼痛程度;患者对麻醉的总体满意度,以及患者是否会向朋友推荐术前用药。

主要结果

咪达唑仑组和安慰剂组在患者人口统计学特征、手术/麻醉类型、生命体征、手术时长、恢复时长以及术后疼痛方面均相似。正如预期的那样,静脉注射咪达唑仑是一种有效的抗焦虑药物。没有逆行性遗忘的证据。尽管围手术期使用了相似的止吐药和阿片类药物,但咪达唑仑组术后恶心的患者少于安慰剂组(25%对50%;p = 0.03)。同样,咪达唑仑组术后呕吐的患者也少于安慰剂组患者(8%对21%),尽管这种差异未达到统计学意义。安慰剂组只有42%的患者会向朋友推荐他们的术前用药,而咪达唑仑组这一比例为85%(p < 0.001)。

结论

除了已知的咪达唑仑抗焦虑作用外,咪达唑仑术前用药是降低术后恶心频率、可能还有呕吐频率并提高患者满意度的有效方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验