Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, Wonju, Gangwon-do, Korea.
Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Wonju Severance Christian Hospital, Wonju, Korea.
BMJ Open. 2022 Jun 22;12(6):e059915. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059915.
To determine the effect of premedication with intramuscular midazolam on patient satisfaction in women undergoing general anaesthesia.
TRIAL DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Double-blind, parallel randomised control trial at a tertiary care medical centre in South Korea. Initially, 140 women aged 20-65 years who underwent general anaesthesia and had an American Society of Anesthesiology physical status classification of I or II were randomly assigned to the intervention group or the control group, and 134 patients (intervention n=65; control n=69) completed the study.
Intramuscular administration of midazolam (0.05 mg/kg) or placebo (normal saline 0.01 mL/kg) on arrival at the preoperative holding area.
The primary outcome was the patient's overall satisfaction with the anaesthesia experience as determined by questionnaire responses on the day after surgery. Satisfaction was defined as a response of 3 or 4 on a five-point scale (0-4). The secondary outcomes included blood pressure, heart rate, oxygen desaturation, recovery duration and postoperative pain.
Patients who received midazolam were more satisfied than those who received placebo (percentage difference: 21.0%, OR 3.56, 95% CI 1.46 to 8.70). A subgroup analysis revealed that this difference was greater in patients with anxiety, defined as those whose Amsterdam Preoperative Anxiety and Information Scale anxiety score was ≥11, than that for the whole sample population (percentage difference: 24.0%, OR 4.33, 95% CI 1.25 to 14.96). Both groups had similar heart rates, blood pressure and oxygen desaturation.
Intramuscular administration of midazolam in women before general anaesthesia in the preoperative holding area improved self-reported satisfaction with the anaesthesia experience, with an acceptable safety profile.
KCT0006002.
确定术前肌肉注射咪达唑仑对全身麻醉女性患者满意度的影响。
试验设计、地点和参与者:这是一项在韩国一家三级医疗中心进行的双盲、平行随机对照试验。最初,140 名年龄在 20-65 岁之间、美国麻醉医师协会身体状况分级为 I 级或 II 级的女性患者被随机分为干预组或对照组,其中 134 名患者(干预组 n=65;对照组 n=69)完成了研究。
在到达术前等候区时,肌肉注射咪达唑仑(0.05mg/kg)或安慰剂(生理盐水 0.01mL/kg)。
主要结局是患者术后第 1 天通过问卷调查对麻醉体验的总体满意度。满意度定义为 5 分制(0-4 分)中的 3 分或 4 分。次要结局包括血压、心率、氧饱和度、恢复时间和术后疼痛。
接受咪达唑仑的患者比接受安慰剂的患者更满意(差异百分比:21.0%,OR 3.56,95%CI 1.46 至 8.70)。亚组分析显示,在焦虑评分≥11 分的阿姆斯特丹术前焦虑和信息量表焦虑评分的患者中,这种差异大于整个样本人群(差异百分比:24.0%,OR 4.33,95%CI 1.25 至 14.96)。两组患者的心率、血压和氧饱和度相似。
在术前等候区对接受全身麻醉的女性患者进行肌肉注射咪达唑仑可改善自我报告的麻醉体验满意度,且具有可接受的安全性。
KCT0006002。