Herr Keela A, Spratt Kevin, Mobily Paula R, Richardson Giovanna
College of Nursing, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA.
Clin J Pain. 2004 Jul-Aug;20(4):207-19. doi: 10.1097/00002508-200407000-00002.
To determine: (1) the psychometric properties and utility of 5 types of commonly used pain rating scales when used with younger and older adults, (2) factors related to failure to successfully use a pain rating scale, (3) pain rating scale preference, and (4) factors impacting scale preference.
A quasi-experimental design was used to gather data from a sample of 86 younger (age 25-55) and 89 older (age 65-94) adult volunteer subjects. Responses of subjects to experimentally induced thermal stimuli were measured with the following pain intensity rating scales: vertical visual analog scale (VAS), 21-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), Verbal Descriptor Scale (VDS), 11-point Verbal Numeric Rating Scale (VNS), and Faces Pain Scale (FPS).
All 5 pain scales were effective in discriminating different levels of pain sensation; however the VDS was most sensitive and reliable. Failure rates for pain scale completion were minimal, except for the VAS. Although age did not impact failure to properly use this pain intensity rating scale, but rather those conditions more commonly associated with advanced age, including cognitive and psychomotor impairment did. The scale most preferred to represent pain intensity in both cohorts of subjects was the NRS, followed by the VDS. Scale preference was not related to cognitive status, educational level, age, race, or sex.
Although all 5 of the pain intensity rating scales were psychometrically sound when used with either age group, failures, internal consistency reliability, construct validity, scale sensitivity, and preference suggest that the VDS is the scale of choice for assessing pain intensity among older adults, including those with mild to moderate cognitive impairment.
确定:(1)5种常用疼痛评定量表在年轻人和老年人中使用时的心理测量特性和效用;(2)与未能成功使用疼痛评定量表相关的因素;(3)疼痛评定量表偏好;以及(4)影响量表偏好的因素。
采用准实验设计,从86名年轻(25 - 55岁)和89名年长(65 - 94岁)的成年志愿者样本中收集数据。使用以下疼痛强度评定量表测量受试者对实验性热刺激的反应:垂直视觉模拟量表(VAS)、21点数字评定量表(NRS)、言语描述量表(VDS)、11点言语数字评定量表(VNS)和面部疼痛量表(FPS)。
所有5种疼痛量表都能有效区分不同程度的疼痛感觉;然而,VDS最为敏感和可靠。除VAS外,疼痛量表完成的失败率极低。虽然年龄并未影响未能正确使用该疼痛强度评定量表,但与高龄更常见相关的那些状况,包括认知和精神运动障碍却有影响。在两组受试者中,最常用于表示疼痛强度的量表是NRS,其次是VDS。量表偏好与认知状态、教育水平、年龄、种族或性别无关。
虽然所有5种疼痛强度评定量表在与任何一个年龄组使用时在心理测量上都是合理的,但失败情况、内部一致性信度、结构效度、量表敏感性和偏好表明,VDS是评估老年人(包括轻度至中度认知障碍者)疼痛强度的首选量表。