Suppr超能文献

针对认知受损和认知未受损的老年人,对选定的疼痛强度量表进行心理测量评估。

Psychometric evaluation of selected pain intensity scales for use with cognitively impaired and cognitively intact older adults.

作者信息

Taylor Laurie Jowers, Harris Judy, Epps Cynthia D, Herr Keela

机构信息

Graduate program, Department of Nursing, State University of West Georgia, Carrollton, GA, USA.

出版信息

Rehabil Nurs. 2005 Mar-Apr;30(2):55-61. doi: 10.1002/j.2048-7940.2005.tb00360.x.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the reliability and validity of selected pain intensity scales such as the Faces Pain Scale (FPS), the Verbal Descriptor Scale (VDS), the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), and the Iowa Pain Thermometer (IPT) to assess pain in cognitively impaired older adults. A descriptive correlational design was used, and a convenience sample of 66 volunteers age 60 and older residing in assisted living facilities in the South was recruited for this study. The sample included 22 (33%) men and 44 (67%) women, with a mean age of 76. Ninety-eight percent (65) of the sample comprised Caucasian participants, with the exception of 1 African-American man. Seventy percent (47) completed high school and/or college. The mean Mini Mental State Exam (MMSE) score was 16, with a range of 1 to 29. Eighty-five percent scored 24 or lower, indicating some degree of cognitive impairment. The remaining 15% were cognitively intact. All but one participant could use each scale to rate their pain. Concurrent validity of the VDS, NRS, and IPT was supported with Spearman rank correlation coefficients ranging from .78 to .86 in the cognitively impaired group. The FPS, however, demonstrated weak correlations with other scales when used with the impaired group, ranging from .48 to .53. In the cognitively intact group, strong correlations ranging from .96 to .97 were found among all of the scales. Test-retest reliability at a 2-week interval was acceptable in the cognitively intact group (Spearman rank correlations ranged from .67 to .85) and unacceptable for most scales in the cognitively impaired group (correlations ranged from .26 to .67). When asked about scale preference, both the cognitively impaired and the intact groups preferred the IPT and the VDS. This study revealed that cognitive impairment did not inhibit participants' ability to use a variety of pain intensity scales, but the stability issue must be considered.

摘要

本研究的目的是确定所选疼痛强度量表的可靠性和有效性,如面部疼痛量表(FPS)、语言描述量表(VDS)、数字评分量表(NRS)和爱荷华疼痛温度计(IPT),以评估认知障碍老年人的疼痛情况。本研究采用描述性相关设计,招募了66名年龄在60岁及以上、居住在南方辅助生活设施中的志愿者作为便利样本。样本包括22名男性(33%)和44名女性(67%),平均年龄为76岁。样本的98%(65名)为白人参与者,另有1名非裔美国男性。70%(47名)完成了高中和/或大学学业。简易精神状态检查表(MMSE)的平均得分为16分,范围为1至29分。85%的得分在24分及以下,表明存在一定程度的认知障碍。其余15%认知功能正常。除一名参与者外,其他所有参与者都能够使用每种量表对自己的疼痛进行评分。在认知障碍组中,VDS、NRS和IPT的同时效度得到支持,斯皮尔曼等级相关系数在0.78至0.86之间。然而,FPS与认知障碍组中其他量表的相关性较弱,在0.48至0.53之间。在认知功能正常组中,所有量表之间的相关性都很强,在0.96至0.97之间。在认知功能正常组中,两周间隔的重测信度是可以接受的(斯皮尔曼等级相关系数在0.67至0.85之间),而在认知障碍组中,大多数量表的重测信度是不可接受的(相关系数在0.26至0.67之间)。当被问及对量表的偏好时,认知障碍组和认知功能正常组都更喜欢IPT和VDS。本研究表明,认知障碍并不妨碍参与者使用多种疼痛强度量表的能力,但必须考虑稳定性问题。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验