Brasel Karen J, Bragg Dawn, Simpson Deborah E, Weigelt John A
Department of Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, 9200 W. Wisconsin Ave., Milwaukee, WI 53226, USA.
Am J Surg. 2004 Jul;188(1):9-12. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2003.11.036.
Most existing residency evaluation tools were constructed to evaluate the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) competencies.
Before ACGME's six competency based assessment requirements for resident performance were developed, we created a residency evaluation tool with 5 domains important to successful surgical resident performance. Reliability was determined after 6 months of use. Factor analysis assessed whether the evaluation tool was a construct-valid measure of the ACGME competencies.
Three hundred forty-three evaluations for 36 surgical residents were tested. The original evaluation tool was highly reliable with an overall reliability of 0.97. Factor analysis defined 4 new combinations of questions analogous to 4 of the ACGME competencies: professionalism (reliability 0.95), patient care (reliability 0.93), medical knowledge (reliability 0.92), and communication (reliability 0.92). The new competency clusters were correlated with each other to a moderate degree.
Our locally developed tool demonstrated high reliability and construct validity for 4 of 6 ACGME competencies. The correlation between factors suggests overlap between competencies.
大多数现有的住院医师评估工具是为评估毕业后医学教育认证委员会(ACGME)的能力而构建的。
在ACGME制定基于六项能力的住院医师表现评估要求之前,我们创建了一个住院医师评估工具,该工具包含对成功的外科住院医师表现至关重要的5个领域。在使用6个月后确定了可靠性。因子分析评估该评估工具是否是对ACGME能力的有效结构测量。
对36名外科住院医师进行了343次评估测试。原始评估工具具有高度可靠性,总体可靠性为0.97。因子分析定义了4个新的问题组合,类似于ACGME的4项能力:职业素养(可靠性0.95)、患者护理(可靠性0.93)、医学知识(可靠性0.92)和沟通(可靠性0.92)。新的能力集群彼此之间存在中度相关性。
我们本地开发的工具对ACGME的6项能力中的4项表现出高可靠性和结构效度。各因子之间的相关性表明能力之间存在重叠。