Carlino P, Lang R, Budtz-Jorgensen E
Division de Gérodontologie et prothèse adjointe, Université de Genève, Suisse.
J Biol Buccale. 1992 Mar;20(1):45-50.
The efficacy of a single-dose application of miconazole varnish in the treatment of denture stomatitis was compared with miconazole gel applied three times/day for 15 days. Among 288 wearers of complete dentures 50 patients severely affected by denture stomatitis and heavily colonized by Candida, were selected. The patients were assigned randomly to two groups: a miconazole varnish group and a gel group. All patients were examined 7 times: before starting the treatment (day 0); during treatment (day 3, 7 and 14); after treatment (day 21, 28 and 35). At each examination a photograph of the palatal mucosa was obtained and quantitative cultures of Candida from the lesions and the fitting denture surface were performed. At day 14 the inflammation was reduced to the same degree in the two groups of patients. A comparison of the antifungal effect, i.e. reduction of the yeast score, showed no significant difference between the two groups. Maximum reduction of the number of yeasts was obtained at day 14. From that moment, recolonization started; thus, about 60% of the treated patients whether it was with the gel or the varnish was positive of Candida by day 35. In conclusion, the present study showed no difference in the clinical and antifungal effect of a single-dose application of miconazole varnish compared with miconazole gel. The varnish seemed to be better with respect to the posology as the total dose of miconazole is minimal and only one application is necessary. Treatment with the miconazole varnish seems particularly indicated in debilitated and non-cooperative patients suffering from Candida-associated denture stomatitis.
将咪康唑清漆单次应用治疗义齿性口炎的疗效与咪康唑凝胶每天应用3次、持续15天的疗效进行了比较。在288名全口义齿佩戴者中,选取了50名受义齿性口炎严重影响且念珠菌大量定植的患者。患者被随机分为两组:咪康唑清漆组和凝胶组。所有患者接受了7次检查:治疗开始前(第0天);治疗期间(第3、7和14天);治疗后(第21、28和35天)。每次检查时,获取腭黏膜的照片,并对病变部位和合适的义齿表面进行念珠菌定量培养。在第14天,两组患者的炎症均减轻到相同程度。对两组抗真菌效果(即酵母菌评分降低情况)的比较显示,两组之间无显著差异。酵母菌数量在第14天达到最大程度减少。从那时起,重新定植开始;因此,到第35天,约60%接受治疗的患者(无论使用凝胶还是清漆)念珠菌检测呈阳性。总之,本研究表明,与咪康唑凝胶相比,咪康唑清漆单次应用在临床和抗真菌效果方面无差异。就用药剂量而言,清漆似乎更好,因为咪康唑的总剂量最小,只需应用一次。咪康唑清漆治疗似乎特别适用于患有念珠菌相关性义齿性口炎的体弱和不合作患者。