Wells C A, Sloane J P, Coleman D, Munt C, Amendoeira I, Apostolikas N, Bellocq J P, Bianchi S, Boecker W, Bussolati G, Connolly C E, Dervan P, Drijkoningen M, Ellis I O, Elston C W, Eusebi V, Faverly D, Heikkila P, Holland R, Jacquemier J, Lacerda M, Martinez-Penuela J, De Miguel C, Peterse J L, Rank F, Reiner A, Saksela E, Sigal-Zafrani B, Sylvan M, Borisch B, Cserni G, Decker T, Kerner H, Kulka J, Regitnig P, Sapino A, Tanous A M, Thorstenson S, Zozaya E
Department of Histopathology, St. Bartholomew's Hospital Medical School, West Smithfield, London, EC1A 7BE, United Kingdom.
Virchows Arch. 2004 Aug;445(2):119-28. doi: 10.1007/s00428-004-1063-8. Epub 2004 Jun 24.
To assess the variability of oestrogen receptor (ER) testing using immunocytochemistry, centrally stained and unstained slides from breast cancers were circulated to the members of the European Working Group for Breast Screening Pathology, who were asked to report on both slides. The results showed that there was almost complete concordance among readers (kappa=0.95) in ER-negative tumours on the stained slide and excellent concordance among readers (kappa=0.82) on the slides stained in each individual laboratory. Tumours showing strong positivity were reasonably well assessed (kappa=0.57 and 0.4, respectively), but there was less concordance in tumours with moderate and low levels of ER, especially when these were heterogeneous in their staining. Because of the variation, the Working Group recommends that laboratories performing these stains should take part in a external quality assurance scheme for immunocytochemistry, should include a tumour with low ER levels as a weak positive control and should audit the percentage positive tumours in their laboratory against the accepted norms annually. The Quick score method of receptor assessment may also have too many categories for good concordance, and grouping of these into fewer categories may remove some of the variation among laboratories.
为评估采用免疫细胞化学检测雌激素受体(ER)的变异性,将来自乳腺癌的经集中染色和未染色的玻片分发给欧洲乳腺筛查病理学工作组的成员,要求他们对这两种玻片进行报告。结果显示,在染色玻片上,ER阴性肿瘤的阅片者之间几乎完全一致(kappa = 0.95),在各个实验室染色的玻片上,阅片者之间一致性良好(kappa = 0.82)。显示强阳性的肿瘤评估得较为合理(kappa分别为0.57和0.4),但ER水平为中度和低度的肿瘤一致性较差,尤其是当这些肿瘤染色不均匀时。由于存在变异性,工作组建议进行这些染色的实验室应参加免疫细胞化学的外部质量保证计划,应将ER水平低的肿瘤作为弱阳性对照纳入其中,并应每年根据公认标准审核其实验室中阳性肿瘤的百分比。受体评估的快速评分方法可能也因类别过多而难以实现良好的一致性,将这些类别合并为较少类别可能会消除实验室之间的一些差异。