Suppr超能文献

医疗保险与处方药覆盖范围的政治史。

A political history of medicare and prescription drug coverage.

作者信息

Oliver Thomas R, Lee Philip R, Lipton Helene L

机构信息

Department of Health Policy and Management, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, 624 N. Broadway, Room 403, Baltimore, MD 21205-1999, USA.

出版信息

Milbank Q. 2004;82(2):283-354. doi: 10.1111/j.0887-378X.2004.00311.x.

Abstract

This article examines the history of efforts to add prescription drug coverage to the Medicare program. It identifies several important patterns in policymaking over four decades. First, prescription drug coverage has usually been tied to the fate of broader proposals for Medicare reform. Second, action has been hampered by divided government, federal budget deficits, and ideological conflict between those seeking to expand the traditional Medicare program and those preferring a greater role for private health care companies. Third, the provisions of the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003 reflect earlier missed opportunities. Policymakers concluded from past episodes that participation in the new program should be voluntary, with Medicare beneficiaries and taxpayers sharing the costs. They ignored lessons from past episodes, however, about the need to match expanded benefits with adequate mechanisms for cost containment. Based on several new circumstances in 2003, the article demonstrates why there was a historic opportunity to add a Medicare prescription drug benefit and identify challenges to implementing an effective policy.

摘要

本文考察了将处方药保险纳入医疗保险计划的努力历程。它识别了四十多年来政策制定中的几个重要模式。首先,处方药保险通常与更广泛的医疗保险改革提案的命运相关联。其次,政府分歧、联邦预算赤字以及寻求扩大传统医疗保险计划的人与倾向于让私人医疗保健公司发挥更大作用的人之间的意识形态冲突阻碍了行动。第三,2003年《医疗保险处方药、改进和现代化法案》的条款反映了早期错失的机会。政策制定者从过去的事件中得出结论,新计划的参与应该是自愿的,医疗保险受益人和纳税人分担成本。然而,他们忽视了过去事件中关于需要将扩大的福利与适当的成本控制机制相匹配的教训。基于2003年的几个新情况,本文阐述了为何存在增加医疗保险处方药福利的历史性机会,并确定了实施有效政策面临的挑战。

相似文献

3
Medicare reform--a wolf in sheep's clothing.医疗保险改革——披羊皮的狼。
J Aging Soc Policy. 2005;17(3):1-17. doi: 10.1300/J031v17n03_01.
5
Medicare and prescription drugs.医疗保险与处方药。
N Engl J Med. 2001 Mar 29;344(13):1010-5. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200103293441311.

引用本文的文献

2
The Health Costs of Cost Sharing.成本分摊的健康成本。
Q J Econ. 2024 May 3;139(4):2037-2082. doi: 10.1093/qje/qjae015. eCollection 2024 Nov.
4
Pharmaceutical policies: effects of regulating drug insurance schemes.药品政策:规范药品保险计划的影响
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 3;5(5):CD011703. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011703.pub2.
6
9
Caution is Needed in Designing Pharmacy Coverage.设计药房保险范围时需谨慎。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2016 Nov 11;5(11):e004466. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.116.004466.

本文引用的文献

1
Employer-sponsored health insurance and prescription drug coverage for new retirees: dramatic declines in five years.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2003 Jul-Dec;Suppl Web Exclusives:W3-334-41. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.w3.334.
2
Health spending rebound continues in 2002.2002年医疗支出继续反弹。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2004 Jan-Feb;23(1):147-59. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.23.1.147.
6
National health expenditures, 1998.1998年国家卫生支出
Health Care Financ Rev. 1999 Winter;21(2):165-210.
7
Managing the pharmacy benefit in Medicare HMOs: what do we really know?
Health Aff (Millwood). 2000 Mar-Apr;19(2):42-58. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.19.2.42.
9
Covering prescription drugs under Medicare: for the good of the patients.
Health Aff (Millwood). 1999 Jul-Aug;18(4):23-4. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.18.4.23.
10
A drug benefit: the necessary prescription for Medicare.
Health Aff (Millwood). 1999 Jul-Aug;18(4):20-2. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.18.4.20.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验