Suppr超能文献

评估研究的未来方向:人员、组织和社会问题。

Future directions in evaluation research: people, organizational, and social issues.

作者信息

Kaplan B, Shaw N T

机构信息

Kaplan Associates, 59 Morris Street, Hamden, CT 06517, USA.

出版信息

Methods Inf Med. 2004;43(3):215-31.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To review evaluation literature concerning people, organizational, and social issues and provide recommendations for future research.

METHOD

Analyze this research and make recommendations.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

Evaluation research is key in identifying how people, organizational, and social issues - all crucial to system design, development, implementation, and use - interplay with informatics projects. Building on a long history of contributions and using a variety of methods, researchers continue developing evaluation theories and methods while producing significant interesting studies. We recommend that future research: 1) Address concerns of the many individuals involved in or affected by informatics applications. 2) Conduct studies in different type and size sites, and with different scopes of systems and different groups of users. Do multi-site or multi-system comparative studies. 3) Incorporate evaluation into all phases of a project. 4) Study failures, partial successes, and changes in project definition or outcome. 5) Employ evaluation approaches that take account of the shifting nature of health care and project environments, and do formative evaluations. 6) Incorporate people, social, organizational, cultural, and concomitant ethical issues into the mainstream of medical informatics. 7) Diversify research approaches and continue to develop new approaches. 8) Conduct investigations at different levels of analysis. 9) Integrate findings from different applications and contextual settings, different areas of health care, studies in other disciplines, and also work that is not published in traditional research outlets. 10) Develop and test theory to inform both further evaluation research and informatics practice.

摘要

目的

回顾关于人员、组织和社会问题的评估文献,并为未来研究提供建议。

方法

分析该研究并提出建议。

结果与结论

评估研究对于确定人员、组织和社会问题(这些对系统设计、开发、实施和使用都至关重要)如何与信息学项目相互作用至关重要。基于长期以来的贡献并运用多种方法,研究人员在持续开展评估理论和方法的同时,也进行了大量有趣的研究。我们建议未来的研究:1)关注参与信息学应用或受其影响的众多个体所关心的问题。2)在不同类型和规模的场所进行研究,研究不同范围的系统和不同用户群体。开展多场所或多系统的比较研究。3)将评估纳入项目的所有阶段。4)研究项目失败、部分成功以及项目定义或结果的变化。5)采用考虑到医疗保健和项目环境变化性质的评估方法,并进行形成性评估。6)将人员、社会、组织、文化以及相关的伦理问题纳入医学信息学的主流。7)使研究方法多样化并继续开发新方法。8)在不同分析层面进行调查。9)整合来自不同应用和背景设置、不同医疗保健领域、其他学科研究以及未在传统研究渠道发表的工作的研究结果。10)开发和测试理论,为进一步的评估研究和信息学实践提供依据。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验