• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

健康信息学研究中的概念模型:文献回顾与发展建议。

Conceptual Models in Health Informatics Research: A Literature Review and Suggestions for Development.

机构信息

Health and Biomedical Informatics Centre, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.

出版信息

JMIR Med Inform. 2016 Feb 24;4(1):e7. doi: 10.2196/medinform.5021.

DOI:10.2196/medinform.5021
PMID:26912288
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4785238/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Contributing to health informatics research means using conceptual models that are integrative and explain the research in terms of the two broad domains of health science and information science. However, it can be hard for novice health informatics researchers to find exemplars and guidelines in working with integrative conceptual models.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this paper is to support the use of integrative conceptual models in research on information and communication technologies in the health sector, and to encourage discussion of these conceptual models in scholarly forums.

METHODS

A two-part method was used to summarize and structure ideas about how to work effectively with conceptual models in health informatics research that included (1) a selective review and summary of the literature of conceptual models; and (2) the construction of a step-by-step approach to developing a conceptual model.

RESULTS

The seven-step methodology for developing conceptual models in health informatics research explained in this paper involves (1) acknowledging the limitations of health science and information science conceptual models; (2) giving a rationale for one's choice of integrative conceptual model; (3) explicating a conceptual model verbally and graphically; (4) seeking feedback about the conceptual model from stakeholders in both the health science and information science domains; (5) aligning a conceptual model with an appropriate research plan; (6) adapting a conceptual model in response to new knowledge over time; and (7) disseminating conceptual models in scholarly and scientific forums.

CONCLUSIONS

Making explicit the conceptual model that underpins a health informatics research project can contribute to increasing the number of well-formed and strongly grounded health informatics research projects. This explication has distinct benefits for researchers in training, research teams, and researchers and practitioners in information, health, and other disciplines.

摘要

背景

为健康信息学研究做出贡献意味着要使用具有综合性的概念模型,并根据健康科学和信息科学这两个广泛的领域来解释研究。然而,对于新手健康信息学研究人员来说,找到具有综合性概念模型的范例和指南可能会很困难。

目的

本文旨在支持在卫生部门的信息和通信技术研究中使用综合性概念模型,并鼓励在学术论坛上讨论这些概念模型。

方法

使用两部分方法总结和构建有关如何在健康信息学研究中有效地使用概念模型的想法,这包括(1)对概念模型文献进行选择性回顾和总结;以及(2)构建开发概念模型的逐步方法。

结果

本文中解释的健康信息学研究中开发概念模型的七步方法包括(1)承认健康科学和信息科学概念模型的局限性;(2)为选择综合性概念模型提供理由;(3)口头和图形化地阐明概念模型;(4)从健康科学和信息科学领域的利益相关者那里寻求对概念模型的反馈;(5)使概念模型与适当的研究计划保持一致;(6)根据随时间获得的新知识调整概念模型;以及(7)在学术和科学论坛上传播概念模型。

结论

明确健康信息学研究项目所依据的概念模型可以有助于增加形成良好且基础扎实的健康信息学研究项目的数量。这种解释对培训中的研究人员、研究团队以及信息、健康和其他学科的研究人员和从业人员都有明显的好处。

相似文献

1
Conceptual Models in Health Informatics Research: A Literature Review and Suggestions for Development.健康信息学研究中的概念模型:文献回顾与发展建议。
JMIR Med Inform. 2016 Feb 24;4(1):e7. doi: 10.2196/medinform.5021.
2
A multidiscipline conceptual framework for consumer health informatics.消费者健康信息学的多学科概念框架。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2007;129(Pt 2):1169-73.
3
Use of theoretical and conceptual frameworks in qualitative research.理论和概念框架在定性研究中的应用。
Nurse Res. 2014 Jul;21(6):34-8. doi: 10.7748/nr.21.6.34.e1252.
4
Person-generated Data in Self-quantification. A Health Informatics Research Program.自我量化中的个人生成数据。一项健康信息学研究计划。
Methods Inf Med. 2017 Jan 9;56(1):40-45. doi: 10.3414/ME15-02-0006. Epub 2016 Oct 26.
5
Avoiding and identifying errors in health technology assessment models: qualitative study and methodological review.避免和识别健康技术评估模型中的错误:定性研究和方法学综述。
Health Technol Assess. 2010 May;14(25):iii-iv, ix-xii, 1-107. doi: 10.3310/hta14250.
6
Rethinking Giftedness and Gifted Education: A Proposed Direction Forward Based on Psychological Science.重新思考天赋和英才教育:基于心理科学的前进方向建议。
Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2011 Jan;12(1):3-54. doi: 10.1177/1529100611418056.
7
Promoting and supporting self-management for adults living in the community with physical chronic illness: A systematic review of the effectiveness and meaningfulness of the patient-practitioner encounter.促进和支持社区中患有慢性身体疾病的成年人进行自我管理:对医患互动的有效性和意义的系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(13):492-582. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907130-00001.
8
Science and practice: a case for medical informatics as a local science of design.科学与实践:医学信息学作为一门局部设计科学的实例
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1998 Nov-Dec;5(6):489-92. doi: 10.1136/jamia.1998.0050489.
9
Interdisciplinary innovations in biomedical and health informatics graduate education.生物医学与健康信息学研究生教育中的跨学科创新。
Methods Inf Med. 2007;46(1):63-6.
10
The Effectiveness of Integrated Care Pathways for Adults and Children in Health Care Settings: A Systematic Review.综合护理路径在医疗环境中对成人和儿童的有效性:一项系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(3):80-129. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907030-00001.

引用本文的文献

1
Factors influencing patients' willingness to share their digital health data for primary and secondary use: A theory- and evidence-based overview of reviews.影响患者分享其数字健康数据用于一级和二级用途意愿的因素:基于理论和证据的综述概述
Digit Health. 2025 Jun 30;11:20552076251340254. doi: 10.1177/20552076251340254. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
2
Health Related Social Needs Screening and Referral Fulfillment: Toward a Complex Model.健康相关社会需求筛查与转诊落实:迈向复杂模式
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2025 May 22;2024:1040-1049. eCollection 2024.
3
Use of the FallAkte Plus System as an IT Infrastructure for the North Rhine-Westphalian General Practice Research Network: Mixed Methods Usability Study.将FallAkte Plus系统用作北莱茵-威斯特法伦州全科医学研究网络的信息技术基础设施:混合方法可用性研究。
JMIR Form Res. 2024 May 20;8:e53206. doi: 10.2196/53206.
4
The pursuit of health equity in digital transformation, health informatics, and the cardiovascular learning healthcare system.在数字转型、健康信息学和心血管学习型医疗系统中追求健康公平。
Am Heart J Plus. 2022 Jun 29;17:100160. doi: 10.1016/j.ahjo.2022.100160. eCollection 2022 May.
5
COVID-19 Conceptual Modeling: Single-Center Cross-Sectional Study.COVID-19概念模型:单中心横断面研究。
JMIR Form Res. 2023 Jul 11;7:e41376. doi: 10.2196/41376.
6
Assessing Health Data Security Risks in Global Health Partnerships: Development of a Conceptual Framework.评估全球卫生伙伴关系中的健康数据安全风险:概念框架的制定
JMIR Form Res. 2021 Dec 8;5(12):e25833. doi: 10.2196/25833.
7
Improving quality of care through patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs): expert interviews using the NHS PROMs Programme and the Swedish quality registers for knee and hip arthroplasty as examples.通过患者报告结局指标(PROMs)提高医疗质量:以英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)的PROMs计划以及瑞典膝关节和髋关节置换术质量登记册为例的专家访谈
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Feb 7;18(1):87. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-2898-z.
8
Automating Quality Measures for Heart Failure Using Natural Language Processing: A Descriptive Study in the Department of Veterans Affairs.使用自然语言处理技术实现心力衰竭质量指标自动化:退伍军人事务部的一项描述性研究。
JMIR Med Inform. 2018 Jan 15;6(1):e5. doi: 10.2196/medinform.9150.
9
The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) in Electronic Health Records. A Systematic Literature Review.电子健康记录中的《国际功能、残疾和健康分类》(ICF)。系统文献综述。
Appl Clin Inform. 2017 Dec 20;8(3):964-980. doi: 10.4338/ACI-2017050078.
10
Research Strategies for Biomedical and Health Informatics. Some Thought-provoking and Critical Proposals to Encourage Scientific Debate on the Nature of Good Research in Medical Informatics.生物医学与健康信息学的研究策略。一些发人深省且关键的提议,以鼓励就医学信息学中优质研究的本质展开科学辩论。
Methods Inf Med. 2017 Jan 25;56(S 01):e1-e10. doi: 10.3414/ME16-01-0125.

本文引用的文献

1
Factors associated with adoption of health information technology: a conceptual model based on a systematic review.与健康信息技术采用相关的因素:基于系统评价的概念模型。
JMIR Med Inform. 2014 May 23;2(1):e9. doi: 10.2196/medinform.3106.
2
Enabling Psychiatrists to be Mobile Phone App Developers: Insights Into App Development Methodologies.使精神科医生能够成为手机应用程序开发者:应用程序开发方法的见解。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2014 Nov 11;2(4):e53. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.3425.
3
Innovative information visualization of electronic health record data: a systematic review.电子健康记录数据的创新信息可视化:一项系统综述。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2015 Mar;22(2):330-9. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2014-002955. Epub 2014 Oct 21.
4
Public health and health promotion capacity at national and regional level: a review of conceptual frameworks.国家和区域层面的公共卫生与健康促进能力:概念框架综述
J Public Health Res. 2014 Apr 24;3(1):199. doi: 10.4081/jphr.2014.199. eCollection 2014 Mar 26.
5
Developing a framework to generate evidence of health outcomes from social media use in chronic disease management.开发一个框架,以生成社交媒体在慢性病管理中的使用对健康结果影响的证据。
Med 2 0. 2013 Aug 8;2(2):e3. doi: 10.2196/med20.2717. eCollection 2013 Jul-Dec.
6
Use of theoretical and conceptual frameworks in qualitative research.理论和概念框架在定性研究中的应用。
Nurse Res. 2014 Jul;21(6):34-8. doi: 10.7748/nr.21.6.34.e1252.
7
The behavioral intervention technology model: an integrated conceptual and technological framework for eHealth and mHealth interventions.行为干预技术模型:一种用于电子健康和移动健康干预的综合概念与技术框架。
J Med Internet Res. 2014 Jun 5;16(6):e146. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3077.
8
The clinical adoption meta-model: a temporal meta-model describing the clinical adoption of health information systems.临床采用元模型:一个描述健康信息系统临床采用的时间元模型。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2014 May 29;14:43. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-14-43.
9
Along the way to developing a theory of the program: a re-examination of the conceptual framework as an organizing strategy.在发展程序理论的过程中:对作为一种组织策略的概念框架进行重新审视。
Eval Program Plann. 2014 Aug;45:157-63. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2014.04.005. Epub 2014 Apr 30.
10
Health information technology and hospital patient safety: a conceptual model to guide research.健康信息技术与医院患者安全:一个指导研究的概念模型
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2013 Sep;39(9):415-25. doi: 10.1016/s1553-7250(13)39055-2.