• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

改进评估以应对健康信息技术的意外后果:技术评估与质量发展工作组的立场文件

Improving Evaluation to Address the Unintended Consequences of Health Information Technology:. a Position Paper from the Working Group on Technology Assessment & Quality Development.

作者信息

Magrabi F, Ammenwerth E, Hyppönen H, de Keizer N, Nykänen P, Rigby M, Scott P, Talmon J, Georgiou A

机构信息

Associate Prof. Farah Magrabi, Centre for Health Informatics, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Phone: +61 2 9850 2429, Fax: +61 2 8088 6234, E-mail:

出版信息

Yearb Med Inform. 2016 Nov 10(1):61-69. doi: 10.15265/IY-2016-013.

DOI:10.15265/IY-2016-013
PMID:27830232
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5171579/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

With growing use of IT by healthcare professionals and patients, the opportunity for any unintended effects of technology to disrupt care health processes and outcomes is intensified. The objectives of this position paper by the IMIA Working Group (WG) on Technology Assessment and Quality Development are to highlight how our ongoing initiatives to enhance evaluation are also addressing the unintended consequences of health IT.

METHODS

Review of WG initiatives Results: We argue that an evidence-based approach underpinned by rigorous evaluation is fundamental to the safe and effective use of IT, and for detecting and addressing its unintended consequences in a timely manner. We provide an overview of our ongoing initiatives to strengthen study design, execution and reporting by using evaluation frameworks and guidelines which can enable better characterization and monitoring of unintended consequences, including the Good Evaluation Practice Guideline in Health Informatics (GEP-HI) and the Statement on Reporting of Evaluation Studies in Health Informatics (STARE-HI). Indicators to benchmark the adoption and impact of IT can similarly be used to monitor unintended effects on healthcare structures, processes and outcome. We have also developed EvalDB, a web-based database of evaluation studies to promulgate evidence about unintended effects and are developing the content for courses to improve training in health IT evaluation.

CONCLUSION

Evaluation is an essential ingredient for the effective use of IT to improve healthcare quality and patient safety. WG resources and skills development initiatives can facilitate a proactive and evidence-based approach to detecting and addressing the unintended effects of health IT.

摘要

背景与目标

随着医疗保健专业人员和患者对信息技术(IT)的使用日益增加,技术产生任何意外影响从而扰乱医疗保健流程及结果的可能性也随之增大。国际医学信息学协会(IMIA)技术评估与质量发展工作组(WG)撰写本立场文件的目的,是强调我们目前为加强评估所开展的举措如何也在应对健康信息技术的意外后果。

方法

审查工作组的举措 结果:我们认为,以严格评估为基础的循证方法对于安全有效地使用信息技术以及及时发现和应对其意外后果至关重要。我们概述了目前正在开展的各项举措,即通过使用评估框架和指南来加强研究设计、实施和报告,这些框架和指南能够更好地描述和监测意外后果,包括《健康信息学良好评估实践指南》(GEP-HI)和《健康信息学评估研究报告声明》(STARE-HI)。用于衡量信息技术采用情况和影响的指标同样可用于监测对医疗保健结构、流程和结果的意外影响。我们还开发了EvalDB,这是一个基于网络的评估研究数据库,用于传播有关意外影响的证据,并且正在开发课程内容,以改进健康信息技术评估方面的培训。

结论

评估是有效利用信息技术以提高医疗质量和患者安全的关键要素。工作组的资源和技能发展举措有助于采取积极主动且基于证据的方法来发现和应对健康信息技术的意外影响。

相似文献

1
Improving Evaluation to Address the Unintended Consequences of Health Information Technology:. a Position Paper from the Working Group on Technology Assessment & Quality Development.改进评估以应对健康信息技术的意外后果:技术评估与质量发展工作组的立场文件
Yearb Med Inform. 2016 Nov 10(1):61-69. doi: 10.15265/IY-2016-013.
2
Evidence Based Health Informatics: 10 Years of Efforts to Promote the Principle. Joint Contribution of IMIA WG EVAL and EFMI WG EVAL.循证健康信息学:推广该原则的十年努力。IMIA评估工作组和EFMI评估工作组的共同贡献。
Yearb Med Inform. 2013;8:34-46.
3
Troubled Waters: Navigating Unintended Consequences of Health Information Technology.问题重重的水域:应对健康信息技术的意外后果
Yearb Med Inform. 2016 Nov 10(1):5-6. doi: 10.15265/IY-2016-056.
4
Health Informatics 3.0 and other increasingly dispersed technologies require even greater trust: promoting safe evidence-based health informatics. Contribution of the IMIA Working Group on Technology Assessment & Quality Development in Health Informatics.健康信息学3.0及其他日益分散的技术需要更高的信任度:促进基于证据的安全健康信息学。国际医学信息学会健康信息学技术评估与质量发展工作组的贡献。
Yearb Med Inform. 2011;6:105-11.
5
Improving the quality of the evidence base of health informatics.提高健康信息学证据基础的质量。
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2008 Nov 6:1211-2.
6
A Survey of the Literature on Unintended Consequences Associated with Health Information Technology: 2014-2015.2014 - 2015年健康信息技术相关意外后果的文献综述
Yearb Med Inform. 2016 Nov 10(1):13-29. doi: 10.15265/IY-2016-036.
7
Methods for Addressing Technology-induced Errors: The Current State.应对技术引发错误的方法:当前状况
Yearb Med Inform. 2016 Nov 10(1):30-40. doi: 10.15265/IY-2016-029.
8
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
9
Systematic prioritization of the STARE-HI reporting items. An application to short conference papers on health informatics evaluation.STARE-HI报告项目的系统优先级排序。在健康信息学评估短会议论文中的应用。
Methods Inf Med. 2012;51(2):104-11. doi: 10.3414/ME10-01-0072. Epub 2011 Mar 4.
10
STARE-HI - Statement on Reporting of Evaluation Studies in Health Informatics: explanation and elaboration.STARE-HI - 卫生信息学评估研究报告的报告规范:说明和扩展。
Appl Clin Inform. 2013 Jul 24;4(3):331-58. doi: 10.4338/ACI-2013-04-RA-0024. eCollection 2013.

引用本文的文献

1
Pharmaceutical Analysis of Inpatient Prescriptions: Systematic Observation of Hospital Pharmacists' Practices in the Early User-Centered Design Phase.住院处方的药物分析:以用户为中心的早期设计阶段医院药剂师实践的系统观察
JMIR Hum Factors. 2025 Apr 25;12:e65959. doi: 10.2196/65959.
2
A Digital Behavior Change Intervention for Health Promotion for Adults in Midlife: Protocol for a Multidimensional Assessment Study.一项针对中年成年人健康促进的数字行为改变干预措施:多维评估研究方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 Feb 7;14:e60559. doi: 10.2196/60559.
3
Social Media's Lessons for Clinical Decision Support: Strategies to Improve Engagement and Acceptance.社交媒体对临床决策支持的启示:提高参与度和接受度的策略
Appl Clin Inform. 2024 May;15(3):528-532. doi: 10.1055/s-0044-1787648. Epub 2024 Jul 3.
4
Human Healthcare and Its Pharmacy Component from a Safety Point of View.从安全角度看人类医疗保健及其药学组成部分。
Pharmacy (Basel). 2024 Apr 7;12(2):64. doi: 10.3390/pharmacy12020064.
5
Barriers and facilitators of health professionals in adopting digital health-related tools for medication appropriateness: A systematic review.医疗专业人员采用数字健康相关工具促进用药合理性的障碍与促进因素:一项系统综述。
Digit Health. 2024 Jan 17;10:20552076231225133. doi: 10.1177/20552076231225133. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
6
Engaging the disability community in informatics research: rationales and practical steps.让残疾群体参与信息学研究:基本原理和实际步骤。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2022 Oct 7;29(11):1989-1995. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocac136.
7
Evaluation in Life Cycle of Information Technology (ELICIT) framework: Supporting the innovation life cycle from business case assessment to summative evaluation.信息技术全生命周期评估(ELICIT)框架:支持从商业案例评估到总结性评估的创新生命周期。
J Biomed Inform. 2022 Mar;127:104014. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2022.104014. Epub 2022 Feb 12.
8
Adopting newer strategies of perioperative quality improvement: The bandwagon moves on….采用围手术期质量改进的新策略:潮流继续向前……
Indian J Anaesth. 2021 Sep;65(9):639-643. doi: 10.4103/ija.ija_866_21. Epub 2021 Oct 8.
9
Perceptual Gaps Between Clinicians and Technologists on Health Information Technology-Related Errors in Hospitals: Observational Study.医院中临床医生与技术人员在健康信息技术相关错误上的认知差距:观察性研究
JMIR Hum Factors. 2021 Feb 5;8(1):e21884. doi: 10.2196/21884.
10
Health Information Technology in Healthcare Quality and Patient Safety: Literature Review.医疗保健质量与患者安全中的健康信息技术:文献综述
JMIR Med Inform. 2018 Jun 4;6(2):e10264. doi: 10.2196/10264.

本文引用的文献

1
Quality of Health IT Evaluations.医疗卫生信息技术评估的质量
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2016;222:291-303.
2
Review of Social and Organizational Issues in Health Information Technology.健康信息技术中的社会与组织问题综述
Healthc Inform Res. 2015 Jul;21(3):152-60. doi: 10.4258/hir.2015.21.3.152. Epub 2015 Jul 31.
3
Patient Portals as a Means of Information and Communication Technology Support to Patient- Centric Care Coordination - the Missing Evidence and the Challenges of Evaluation. A joint contribution of IMIA WG EVAL and EFMI WG EVAL.患者门户网站作为以患者为中心的护理协调的信息和通信技术支持手段——缺失的证据及评估挑战。IMIA评估工作组和EFMI评估工作组的联合贡献。
Yearb Med Inform. 2015 Aug 13;10(1):148-59. doi: 10.15265/IY-2015-007. Epub 2015 Jun 30.
4
Clinical safety of England's national programme for IT: a retrospective analysis of all reported safety events 2005 to 2011.英国国家信息技术项目的临床安全性:对2005年至2011年所有报告的安全事件的回顾性分析。
Int J Med Inform. 2015 Mar;84(3):198-206. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2014.12.003. Epub 2015 Jan 4.
5
Theory of Change: a theory-driven approach to enhance the Medical Research Council's framework for complex interventions.变革理论:一种以理论为驱动的方法,用于完善医学研究理事会针对复杂干预措施的框架。
Trials. 2014 Jul 5;15:267. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-267.
6
STARE-HI - Statement on Reporting of Evaluation Studies in Health Informatics: explanation and elaboration.STARE-HI - 卫生信息学评估研究报告的报告规范:说明和扩展。
Appl Clin Inform. 2013 Jul 24;4(3):331-58. doi: 10.4338/ACI-2013-04-RA-0024. eCollection 2013.
7
Evidence Based Health Informatics: 10 Years of Efforts to Promote the Principle. Joint Contribution of IMIA WG EVAL and EFMI WG EVAL.循证健康信息学:推广该原则的十年努力。IMIA评估工作组和EFMI评估工作组的共同贡献。
Yearb Med Inform. 2013;8:34-46.
8
Potential unintended consequences of health information exchange.健康信息交换的潜在意外后果。
J Gen Intern Med. 2013 Dec;28(12):1663-6. doi: 10.1007/s11606-012-2313-0. Epub 2013 May 21.
9
Understanding unintended consequences for EMR: a literature review.了解电子病历的意外后果:一项文献综述。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2012;178:192-8.
10
The dangerous decade.危险的十年。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2012 Jan-Feb;19(1):2-5. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000674. Epub 2011 Nov 24.