Hahn Robert A, Lowy Jessica, Bilukha Oleg, Snyder Susan, Briss Peter, Crosby Alex, Fullilove Mindy T, Tuma Farris, Moscicki Eve K, Liberman Akiva, Schofield Amanda, Corso Phaedra S
Division of Prevention Research and Analytic Methods, Epidemiology Program Office, CDC, USA.
MMWR Recomm Rep. 2004 Jul 2;53(RR-10):1-8.
In therapeutic foster care programs, youths who cannot live at home are placed in homes with foster parents who have been trained to provide a structured environment that supports their learning social and emotional skills. To assess the effectiveness of such programs in preventing violent behavior among participating youths, the Task Force on Community Preventive Services conducted a systematic review of the scientific literature regarding these programs. Reported and observed violence, including violent crime, were direct measures. Proxy measures were externalizing behavior (i.e., behavior in which psychological problems are acted out), conduct disorder, and arrests, convictions, or delinquency, as ascertained from official records, for acts that might have included violence. Reviewed studies assessed two similar interventions, distinguished by the ages and underlying problems of the target populations. Therapeutic foster care for reduction of violence by children with severe emotional disturbance (hereafter referred to as cluster therapeutic foster care) involved programs (average duration: 18 months) in which clusters of foster-parent families cooperated in the care of children (aged 5-13 years) with severe emotional disturbance. The Task Force found insufficient evidence to determine the effectiveness of this intervention in preventing violence. Therapeutic foster care for the reduction of violence by chronically delinquent adolescents (hereafter referred to as program-intensive therapeutic foster care) involved short-term programs (average duration: 6-7 months) in which program personnel collaborated closely and daily with foster families caring for adolescents (aged 12-18 years) with a history of chronic delinquency. On the basis of sufficient evidence of effectiveness, the Task Force recommends this intervention for prevention of violence among adolescents with a history of chronic delinquency. This report briefly describes how the reviews were conducted, provides additional information about the findings, and provides information that might help communities in applying the intervention locally.
在治疗性寄养项目中,无法在家中生活的青少年会被安置到寄养家庭,这些寄养父母接受过培训,能够提供一个支持他们学习社交和情感技能的结构化环境。为了评估此类项目在预防参与项目的青少年暴力行为方面的有效性,社区预防服务特别工作组对有关这些项目的科学文献进行了系统综述。报告的和观察到的暴力行为,包括暴力犯罪,都是直接衡量指标。替代指标是外化行为(即表现出心理问题的行为)、品行障碍,以及根据官方记录确定的、可能包括暴力行为的逮捕、定罪或犯罪记录。所审查的研究评估了两种类似的干预措施,它们的区别在于目标人群的年龄和潜在问题。针对患有严重情绪障碍儿童减少暴力行为的治疗性寄养(以下简称集群治疗性寄养)涉及一些项目(平均时长:18个月),在这些项目中,多组寄养父母家庭合作照顾患有严重情绪障碍的儿童(5至13岁)。特别工作组发现,没有足够的证据来确定这种干预措施在预防暴力行为方面的有效性。针对长期违法青少年减少暴力行为的治疗性寄养(以下简称强化治疗性寄养项目)涉及短期项目(平均时长:6至7个月),在这些项目中,项目人员每天与照顾有长期违法历史青少年(12至18岁)的寄养家庭密切合作。基于充分的有效性证据,特别工作组建议对有长期违法历史的青少年采用这种干预措施来预防暴力行为。本报告简要描述了综述的开展方式,提供了有关研究结果的更多信息,以及可能有助于社区在当地应用该干预措施的信息。