Papatheodoridis G V, Cholongitas E
Academic Department of Medicine, Hippokration General Hospital, Athens, Greece.
J Viral Hepat. 2004 Jul;11(4):287-96. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2893.2004.00522.x.
A significant proportion of chronic hepatitis C patients fails to achieve sustained virologic response even after treatment with the current, more potent, combination of pegylated interferon-alpha (IFNa) plus ribavirin. Such patients represent a rather heterogeneous group and may be divided initially into relapsers and nonresponders. Both the type of previous therapy and of previous response are very important factors for the indication and the type of re-treatment. The combination of pegylated IFNa and ribavirin seems to be a rational approach for patients who failed to respond to IFNa monotherapy. Pegylated IFNa-based regimens appear to induce sustained responses in 40-68% of relapsers but in only 11% of nonresponders to previous therapy with standard IFNa plus ribavirin. Thus, new therapeutic approaches are needed for the latter subgroup of patients as well as those who fail to respond to pegylated IFNa-based regimens. Such new approaches currently under evaluation include the triple combination of pegylated IFNa, ribavirin, and amantadine, alternative types of IFN, use of agents with ribavirin like activity but lesser degrees of side-effects, inhibitors of hepatitis C virus (HCV) replication, mainly inhibitors of NS3 protease or helicase, antisense oligonucleotides, and ribozymes, and several immunomodulators. Moreover, maintenance antifibrotic therapy, mostly with low doses of pegylated IFNa, are under evaluation in patients with advanced fibrosis. Thus, even in the current era of the potent pegylated IFNa-based regimens, the management of these difficult-to-treat patients represents an increasingly frequent problem and perhaps the most challenging therapeutic task in chronic hepatitis C.
相当一部分慢性丙型肝炎患者即使接受了目前更有效的聚乙二醇化干扰素-α(IFNa)加利巴韦林联合治疗,仍未能实现持续病毒学应答。这类患者群体相当异质,最初可分为复发者和无应答者。既往治疗类型和既往应答情况都是再次治疗的指征和类型的非常重要的因素。聚乙二醇化IFNa和利巴韦林联合似乎是对IFNa单药治疗无应答患者的合理治疗方法。基于聚乙二醇化IFNa的治疗方案似乎能使40%-68%的复发者实现持续应答,但对既往接受标准IFNa加利巴韦林治疗无应答者中只有11%能实现持续应答。因此,对于后一组患者以及对基于聚乙二醇化IFNa治疗方案无应答的患者,都需要新的治疗方法。目前正在评估的此类新方法包括聚乙二醇化IFNa、利巴韦林和金刚烷胺的三联组合、替代类型的干扰素、使用具有类似利巴韦林活性但副作用较小的药物、丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)复制抑制剂(主要是NS3蛋白酶或解旋酶抑制剂)、反义寡核苷酸和核酶,以及几种免疫调节剂。此外,对于有严重肝纤维化的患者,正在评估主要采用低剂量聚乙二醇化IFNa的维持抗纤维化治疗。因此,即使在当前基于强效聚乙二醇化IFNa治疗方案的时代,管理这些难治性患者仍是一个日益常见的问题,可能也是慢性丙型肝炎治疗中最具挑战性的任务。