Themba-Nixon Makani, Sutton Charyn D, Shorty Lawrence, Lew Rod, Baezconde-Garbanati Lourdes
Praxis Project/PATH, Washington, DC, USA.
Health Promot Pract. 2004 Jul;5(3 Suppl):113S-128S. doi: 10.1177/1524839904264609.
This article examines state Master Settlement Agreement (MSA) funding of tobacco control in communities of color. The primary research question was whether MSA monies resulted in dedicated funding for communities of color at the state level. This article also explores some of the historical factors that shape the relationship of communities of color to MSA funding as well as some of the institutional barriers to implementing comprehensive tobacco control programs in these communities. Three model approaches to funding parity in tobacco control programs were examined as case studies. Because of the limited amount of research available in this area, the data on tobacco control funding for communities of color was collected in interviews with state tobacco control agencies during October 2003. Findings supported our hypothesis that there were few dedicated resources at the state level for tobacco control and prevention in communities of color.
本文探讨了州烟草主和解协议(MSA)对有色人种社区烟草控制的资金投入情况。主要研究问题是MSA资金在州一级是否为有色人种社区带来了专项资金。本文还探讨了一些塑造有色人种社区与MSA资金关系的历史因素,以及在这些社区实施全面烟草控制项目的一些制度性障碍。作为案例研究,考察了烟草控制项目资金公平性的三种模式方法。由于该领域现有研究有限,2003年10月通过对州烟草控制机构的访谈收集了有关有色人种社区烟草控制资金的数据。研究结果支持了我们的假设,即州一级用于有色人种社区烟草控制和预防的专项资源很少。