Suppr超能文献

一项关于咪达唑仑、氟哌啶醇与劳拉西泮用于暴力及严重躁动患者化学约束的前瞻性、双盲、随机试验。

A prospective, double-blind, randomized trial of midazolam versus haloperidol versus lorazepam in the chemical restraint of violent and severely agitated patients.

作者信息

Nobay Flavia, Simon Barry C, Levitt M Andrew, Dresden Graham M

机构信息

Division of Emergency Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.

出版信息

Acad Emerg Med. 2004 Jul;11(7):744-9. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2003.06.015.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To determine if midazolam is superior to lorazepam or haloperidol in the management of violent and severely agitated patients in the emergency department. Superiority would be determined if midazolam resulted in a significantly shorter time to sedation and shorter time to arousal.

METHODS

This was a randomized, prospective, double-blind study of a convenience sample of patients from an urban, county teaching emergency department. Participants included 111 violent and severely agitated patients. Patients were randomized to receive intramuscular midazolam (5 mg), lorazepam (2 mg), or haloperidol (5 mg).

RESULTS

The mean (+/-SD) age was 40.7 (+/-13) years. The mean (+/-SD) time to sedation was 18.3 (+/-14) minutes for patients receiving midazolam, 28.3 (+/-25) minutes for haloperidol, and 32.2 (+/-20) minutes for lorazepam. Midazolam had a significantly shorter time to sedation than lorazepam and haloperidol (p < 0.05). The mean difference between midazolam and lorazepam was 13.0 minutes (95% confidence interval [95% CI] = 5.1 to 22.8 minutes) and that between midazolam and haloperidol was 9.9 minutes (95% CI = 0.5 to 19.3 minutes). Time to arousal was 81.9 minutes for patients receiving midazolam, 126.5 minutes for haloperidol, and 217.2 minutes for lorazepam. Time to arousal for midazolam was significantly shorter than for both haloperidol and lorazepam (p < 0.05). The mean difference in time to awakening between midazolam and lorazepam was 135.3 minutes (95% CI = 89 to 182 minutes) and that between midazolam and haloperidol was 44.6 minutes (95% CI = 9 to 80 minutes). There was no significant difference over time by repeated-measures analysis of variance between groups in regard to changes in systolic and diastolic blood pressure (p = 0.8965, p = 0.9581), heart rate (p = 0.5517), respiratory rate (p = 0.8191), and oxygen saturation (p = 0.8991).

CONCLUSIONS

Midazolam has a significantly shorter time to onset of sedation and a more rapid time to arousal than lorazepam or haloperidol. The efficacies of all three drugs appear to be similar.

摘要

目的

确定在急诊科处理暴力及严重躁动患者时,咪达唑仑是否优于劳拉西泮或氟哌啶醇。若咪达唑仑能显著缩短达到镇静的时间及苏醒时间,则判定其具有优越性。

方法

这是一项对来自城市县级教学急诊科的便利样本患者进行的随机、前瞻性、双盲研究。参与者包括111名暴力及严重躁动患者。患者被随机分配接受肌内注射咪达唑仑(5毫克)、劳拉西泮(2毫克)或氟哌啶醇(5毫克)。

结果

平均(±标准差)年龄为40.7(±13)岁。接受咪达唑仑的患者达到镇静的平均(±标准差)时间为18.3(±14)分钟,接受氟哌啶醇的为28.3(±25)分钟,接受劳拉西泮的为32.2(±20)分钟。咪达唑仑达到镇静的时间显著短于劳拉西泮和氟哌啶醇(p<0.05)。咪达唑仑与劳拉西泮之间的平均差异为13.0分钟(95%置信区间[95%CI]=5.1至22.8分钟),咪达唑仑与氟哌啶醇之间的平均差异为9.9分钟(95%CI=0.5至19.3分钟)。接受咪达唑仑的患者苏醒时间为81.9分钟,接受氟哌啶醇的为126.5分钟,接受劳拉西泮的为217.2分钟。咪达唑仑的苏醒时间显著短于氟哌啶醇和劳拉西泮(p<0.05)。咪达唑仑与劳拉西泮之间苏醒时间的平均差异为135.3分钟(95%CI=89至182分钟),咪达唑仑与氟哌啶醇之间的平均差异为44.6分钟(95%CI=9至80分钟)。通过重复测量方差分析,各组间收缩压和舒张压变化(p=0.8965,p=0.9581)、心率(p=0.5517)、呼吸频率(p=0.8191)和血氧饱和度(p=0.8991)随时间无显著差异。

结论

与劳拉西泮或氟哌啶醇相比,咪达唑仑达到镇静的起效时间显著更短,苏醒时间更快。三种药物的疗效似乎相似。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验