Suppr超能文献

利培酮与氟哌啶醇联合劳拉西泮治疗急性激越和精神病:一项前瞻性、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验。

Risperidone versus haloperidol, in combination with lorazepam, in the treatment of acute agitation and psychosis: a pilot, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

作者信息

Veser Frederick H, Veser Belynda Dunn, McMullan Jason T, Zealberg Joseph, Currier Glenn W

机构信息

Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, 29455, USA.

出版信息

J Psychiatr Pract. 2006 Mar;12(2):103-8. doi: 10.1097/00131746-200603000-00005.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare oral risperidone and intramuscular (IM) haloperidol, both in combination with IM lorazepam, in the management of acute agitation and psychosis in the medical emergency department.

METHODS

In this prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study of 30 patients presenting to the emergency department with acute agitation and/or psychosis, three groups of 10 patients received oral and IM medications: 1) 2 mg oral risperidone and 2 mg IM lorazepam; 2) 5 mg oral haloperidol and 2 mg IM lorazepam; 3) oral placebo and 2 mg IM lorazepam. Each treatment group received both an injection and a tablet to reduce treatment group variability. Patients were evaluated using the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) and the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) before receiving medication and at 30 and 90 minutes after medication was administered. The intergroup mean percent reductions in rating scale scores were compared using ANOVA, chi-square, and Kruskal-Wallis tests.

RESULTS

There were no statistically significant differences among the groups at any point. The two groups receiving an antipsychotic plus lorazepam showed a trend towards increased symptom reduction compared with the group receiving lorazepam alone, although this trend was not statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

Lorazepam alone was as effective as lorazepam plus haloperidol or lorazepam plus risperidone in this small trial. While not statistically significant, a trend toward better outcomes with combined treatment warrants further study.

摘要

目的

比较口服利培酮与肌内注射(IM)氟哌啶醇联合IM劳拉西泮用于急诊科急性激越和精神病管理的效果。

方法

在这项针对30例因急性激越和/或精神病就诊于急诊科的患者的前瞻性、随机、安慰剂对照、双盲研究中,三组各10例患者接受口服和IM药物治疗:1)2mg口服利培酮和2mg IM劳拉西泮;2)5mg口服氟哌啶醇和2mg IM劳拉西泮;3)口服安慰剂和2mg IM劳拉西泮。每个治疗组均接受一次注射和一片药,以减少治疗组间的变异性。在给药前以及给药后30分钟和90分钟,使用简明精神病评定量表(BPRS)和阳性与阴性症状量表(PANSS)对患者进行评估。使用方差分析、卡方检验和克鲁斯卡尔-沃利斯检验比较组间评定量表分数的平均降低百分比。

结果

在任何时间点,各组之间均无统计学显著差异。与单独接受劳拉西泮治疗的组相比,接受抗精神病药物加劳拉西泮治疗的两组症状减轻趋势有所增加,尽管这一趋势无统计学显著性。

结论

在这项小型试验中,单独使用劳拉西泮与劳拉西泮加氟哌啶醇或劳拉西泮加利培酮的效果相同。虽然无统计学显著性,但联合治疗有更好结局的趋势值得进一步研究。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验