Sakura S, Sumi M, Saito Y, Koh J, Asano M, Tanaka A, Kosaka Y
Department of Anesthesiology, Shimane Medical University, Shimane, Japan.
J Anesth. 1990 Jul;4(3):219-25. doi: 10.1007/s0054000040219.
We evaluated in analgesic and sedative effects of continuous epidural infusion of two analgesic regimens in ventilated patients following esophagectomy. Forty-six patients, divided into two treatment groups, received postoperative continuous epidural infusion of morphine, or that of a combination of bupivacaine and morphine. Assessments were made with the following indices: pain relief score, somnolence score, patient ventilator coordination score, and the number of supplemental administrations of analgesics and sedatives. No significant differences occurred in somnolence scores or patient ventilator coordination scores between the two groups, which revealed satisfactory sedation for mechanical ventilation. Patients receiving the combination of bupivacaine and morphine had significantly less pain postoperatively, requiring a smaller number of supplemental administrations of analgesics and sedatives ( P < 0.05). It is concluded that: 1) continuous epidural infusion of analgesics gives potent analgesia and sedation of ventilated patients following esophagectomy; 2) the combination of bupivacaine and morphine gives pain relief superior to morphine alone.
我们评估了持续硬膜外输注两种镇痛方案对食管癌切除术后通气患者的镇痛和镇静效果。46例患者分为两个治疗组,术后分别持续硬膜外输注吗啡或布比卡因与吗啡的联合制剂。采用以下指标进行评估:疼痛缓解评分、嗜睡评分、患者与呼吸机协调性评分以及镇痛和镇静药物的补充给药次数。两组之间的嗜睡评分或患者与呼吸机协调性评分无显著差异,这表明机械通气的镇静效果良好。接受布比卡因和吗啡联合制剂的患者术后疼痛明显减轻,镇痛和镇静药物的补充给药次数较少(P<0.05)。得出以下结论:1)持续硬膜外输注镇痛药可使食管癌切除术后通气患者获得有效的镇痛和镇静;2)布比卡因和吗啡联合制剂的镇痛效果优于单独使用吗啡。