Minneci Peter C, Deans Katherine J, Banks Steven M, Eichacker Peter Q, Natanson Charles
Clinical Center, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, USA.
Ann Intern Med. 2004 Jul 6;141(1):47-56. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-141-1-200407060-00014.
Previous meta-analyses demonstrated that high-dose glucocorticoids were not beneficial in sepsis. Recently, lower-dose glucocorticoids have been studied.
To compare recent trials of glucocorticoids for sepsis with previous glucocorticoid trials.
Systematic MEDLINE search for studies published between 1988 and 2003.
Randomized, controlled trials of sepsis that examined the effects of glucocorticoids on survival or vasopressor requirements.
Two investigators independently collected data on patient and study characteristics, treatment interventions, and outcomes.
The 5 included trials revealed a consistent and beneficial effect of glucocorticoids on survival (I2 = 0%; relative benefit, 1.23, [95% CI, 1.01 to 1.50]; P = 0.036) and shock reversal (I2 = 0%; relative benefit, 1.71 [CI, 1.29 to 2.26]; P < 0.001). These effects were the same regardless of adrenal function. In contrast, 8 trials published before 1989 demonstrated a survival disadvantage with steroid treatment (I2 = 14%; relative benefit, 0.89 [CI, 0.82 to 0.97]; P = 0.008). In comparison with the earlier trials, the more recent trials administered steroids later after patients met enrollment criteria (median, 23 hours vs. <2 hours; P = 0.02), for longer courses (6 days vs. 1 day; P = 0.01), and in lower total dosages (hydrocortisone equivalents, 1209 mg vs. 23 975 mg; P = 0.01) to patients with higher control group mortality rates (mean, 57% vs. 34%; P = 0.06) who were more likely to be vasopressor-dependent (100% vs. 65%; P = 0.03). The relationship between steroid dose and survival was linear, characterized by benefit at low doses and increasing harm at higher doses (P = 0.02).
We could not analyze time-related improvements in medical care and potential bias secondary to nonreporting of negative study results.
Although short courses of high-dose glucocorticoids decreased survival during sepsis, a 5- to 7-day course of physiologic hydrocortisone doses with subsequent tapering increases survival rate and shock reversal in patients with vasopressor-dependent septic shock.
既往的荟萃分析表明,高剂量糖皮质激素对脓毒症并无益处。近来,已对低剂量糖皮质激素展开研究。
比较近期关于糖皮质激素治疗脓毒症的试验与既往糖皮质激素试验。
对1988年至2003年间发表的研究进行系统的医学文献数据库检索。
脓毒症的随机对照试验,这些试验考察了糖皮质激素对生存率或血管升压药需求的影响。
两名研究者独立收集有关患者及研究特征、治疗干预措施和结果的数据。
纳入的5项试验显示,糖皮质激素对生存率(I² = 0%;相对获益,1.23,[95%置信区间,1.01至1.50];P = 0.036)和休克逆转(I² = 0%;相对获益,1.71 [置信区间,1.29至2.26];P < 0.001)具有一致且有益的作用。无论肾上腺功能如何,这些作用均相同。相比之下,1989年之前发表的8项试验表明,类固醇治疗存在生存劣势(I² = 14%;相对获益,0.89 [置信区间,0.82至0.97];P = 0.008)。与早期试验相比,近期试验在患者符合纳入标准后更晚给予类固醇(中位数,23小时对<2小时;P = 0.02),疗程更长(6天对1天;P = 0.01),且给予的总剂量更低(氢化可的松等效剂量,1209毫克对23975毫克;P = 0.01),给予的是对照组死亡率更高(平均,57%对34%;P = 0.06)且更可能依赖血管升压药的患者(100%对65%;P = 0.03)。类固醇剂量与生存率之间的关系呈线性,特点是低剂量有益,高剂量危害增加(P = 0.02)。
我们无法分析医疗护理方面与时间相关的改善情况以及因未报告阴性研究结果导致的潜在偏倚。
尽管高剂量糖皮质激素短期疗程会降低脓毒症期间的生存率,但对于依赖血管升压药的脓毒性休克患者,给予生理剂量的氢化可的松5至7天疗程并随后逐渐减量可提高生存率并促进休克逆转。