West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
JAMA Intern Med. 2019 Feb 1;179(2):213-223. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.5849.
Although corticosteroids are widely used for adults with sepsis, both the overall benefit and potential risks remain unclear.
To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of corticosteroids in patients with sepsis.
MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched from inception until March 20, 2018, and updated on August 10, 2018. The terms corticosteroids, sepsis, septic shock, hydrocortisone, controlled trials, and randomized controlled trial were searched alone or in combination. Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) were included that compared administration of corticosteroids with placebo or standard supportive care in adults with sepsis.
Meta-analyses were conducted using a random-effects model to calculate risk ratios (RRs) and mean differences (MDs) with corresponding 95% CIs. Two independent reviewers completed citation screening, data abstraction, and risk assessment.
Twenty-eight-day mortality.
This meta-analysis included 37 RCTs (N = 9564 patients). Eleven trials were rated as low risk of bias. Corticosteroid use was associated with reduced 28-day mortality (RR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.82-0.98; I2 = 27%) and intensive care unit (ICU) mortality (RR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.77-0.94; I2 = 0%) and in-hospital mortality (RR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.79-0.99; I2 = 38%). Corticosteroids were significantly associated with increased shock reversal at day 7 (MD, 1.95; 95% CI, 0.80-3.11) and vasopressor-free days (MD, 1.95; 95% CI, 0.80-3.11) and with ICU length of stay (MD, -1.16; 95% CI, -2.12 to -0.20), the sequential organ failure assessment score at day 7 (MD, -1.38; 95% CI, -1.87 to -0.89), and time to resolution of shock (MD, -1.35; 95% CI, -1.78 to -0.91). However, corticosteroid use was associated with increased risk of hyperglycemia (RR, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.08-1.30) and hypernatremia (RR, 1.57; 95% CI, 1.24-1.99).
The findings suggest that administration of corticosteroids is associated with reduced 28-day mortality compared with placebo use or standard supportive care. More research is needed to associate personalized medicine with the corticosteroid treatment to select suitable patients who are more likely to show a benefit.
尽管皮质类固醇被广泛用于治疗败血症成人患者,但它们的总体益处和潜在风险仍不清楚。
对皮质类固醇治疗败血症患者的疗效和安全性进行系统评价和荟萃分析。
从建库到 2018 年 3 月 20 日,检索了 MEDLINE、Embase 和 Cochrane 对照试验中心注册库,并于 2018 年 8 月 10 日进行了更新。检索的术语包括皮质类固醇、败血症、感染性休克、氢化可的松、对照试验和随机对照试验,单独或组合使用。纳入了比较皮质类固醇与安慰剂或标准支持性治疗用于败血症成人患者的随机临床试验(RCT)。
使用随机效应模型进行荟萃分析,以计算风险比(RR)和相应 95%置信区间(CI)的均值差异(MD)。两名独立的审查员完成了引用筛选、数据提取和风险评估。
28 天死亡率。
本荟萃分析包括 37 项 RCT(共 9564 例患者)。11 项试验被评为低偏倚风险。皮质类固醇的使用与降低 28 天死亡率(RR,0.90;95%CI,0.82-0.98;I2=27%)和 ICU 死亡率(RR,0.85;95%CI,0.77-0.94;I2=0%)和住院死亡率(RR,0.88;95%CI,0.79-0.99;I2=38%)相关。皮质类固醇与第 7 天休克逆转的增加显著相关(MD,1.95;95%CI,0.80-3.11)和血管加压素无天数(MD,1.95;95%CI,0.80-3.11)以及 ICU 住院时间(MD,-1.16;95%CI,-2.12 至-0.20)、第 7 天序贯器官衰竭评估评分(MD,-1.38;95%CI,-1.87 至-0.89)和休克缓解时间(MD,-1.35;95%CI,-1.78 至-0.91)。然而,皮质类固醇的使用与高血糖(RR,1.19;95%CI,1.08-1.30)和高钠血症(RR,1.57;95%CI,1.24-1.99)的风险增加相关。
研究结果表明,与安慰剂使用或标准支持性治疗相比,皮质类固醇的使用与降低 28 天死亡率相关。需要进一步的研究将个体化医学与皮质类固醇治疗联系起来,以选择更有可能受益的合适患者。