MacIntosh Brian R, Svedahl Krista, Kim Minhan
Human Performance Laboratory, Faculty of Kinesiology, University of Calgary, T2N 1N4, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2004 Aug;92(4-5):369-75. doi: 10.1007/s00421-004-1177-3. Epub 2004 Jul 6.
There is an optimal load and corresponding velocity at which peak power output occurs. It is reasonable to expect that these conditions will change as a result of fatigue during 30 s of all-out cycling. This study evaluated optimal velocity after 30 s of maximal isokinetic cycle ergometer exercise and tested the hypothesis that progressive adjustment of velocity (optimized) during 30 s of all-out cycling would permit greater short-term work capacity (STWC). Non-fatigued optimal cadence [NF(OC), 109.6 (2.5) rpm] was determined for ten males on an SRM ergometer using regression analysis of the torque-angular velocity relation during a 7-s maximal acceleration. Fatigued optimal cadence [73.4 (2.4) rpm] was determined in the same way, immediately after a 30-s isokinetic test at NF(OC). A subsequent trial with cadence decreasing in steps from NF(OC) to a conservative estimate of fatigued optimal cadence [83.9 (2.8) rpm] was completed to see if more work could be done with a more optimal cadence during the test. STWC was not different ( P=0.50) between the constant [23,681 (764) J] and optimized [23,679 (708) J] conditions. Another more radical progressive change in cadence with four subjects yielded the same result (no increase in STWC). Extraneous factors apparently contribute more to variability in STWC than differences between constant and adjusted optimization of conditions.
存在一个能产生最大功率输出的最佳负荷和相应速度。可以合理预期,在30秒全力骑行过程中,由于疲劳,这些条件会发生变化。本研究评估了在30秒最大等速自行车测力计运动后的最佳速度,并检验了这样一个假设:在30秒全力骑行过程中逐步调整速度(优化)将允许更大的短期工作能力(STWC)。使用7秒最大加速度期间扭矩 - 角速度关系的回归分析,在SRM测力计上为10名男性确定了非疲劳最佳踏频[NF(OC),109.6(2.5)转/分钟]。在以NF(OC)进行30秒等速测试后,立即以同样的方式确定疲劳最佳踏频[73.4(2.4)转/分钟]。随后进行了一项试验,踏频从NF(OC)逐步降低到疲劳最佳踏频的保守估计值[83.9(2.8)转/分钟],以查看在测试期间采用更优化的踏频是否可以完成更多工作。在恒定[23,681(764)焦耳]和优化[23,679(708)焦耳]条件下,STWC没有差异(P = 0.50)。对四名受试者进行的另一种更激进的踏频逐步变化也得到了相同的结果(STWC没有增加)。显然,外部因素对STWC变异性的影响比条件的恒定与调整优化之间的差异更大。