Andersson-Wenckert Ingrid E, van Dijken Jan W V, Kieri Catharina
Department of Odontology/Pedodontics, Umeå University, 901 87 Umeå, Sweden.
Am J Dent. 2004 Feb;17(1):43-50.
To evaluate the durability of a modified open-sandwich restoration utilizing a resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC) in large cavities.
268, mostly extensive, Class II Vitremer/Z100 restorations were placed in 151 patients. 47% of the restorations were placed in patients considered as caries-risk patients. Six experimental groups, differing from each other in thickness of RMGIC layer and preconditioning, were evaluated at baseline and annually during 6-7 years according to modified USPHS criteria.
After 6 years, 220 restorations were evaluated. 42 failures (19%) were observed. The most frequent reasons for failure were material fracture (n = 11), tooth fractures (n = 9) and secondary caries (n = 10). Non-acceptable proximal dissolution of the RMGIC was seen in six restorations. Significantly more failures, but similar dissolution of the RMGIC, were recorded in high caries risk patients. No differences were seen between the experimental groups or between restorations with thick or thin RMGIC layer. 160 restorations were also evaluated at 7 years. Another 13 failures were observed, eight with non-acceptable dissolution, three secondary caries and two fractures. It can be concluded that the modified open sandwich restoration showed an acceptable durability for the extensive restorations evaluated. An accelerating dissolution of the RMGIC was observed at the end of the study.
评估采用树脂改性玻璃离子水门汀(RMGIC)修复大龋洞的改良开放式三明治修复体的耐久性。
为151例患者放置了268个主要为大面积的II类Vitremer/Z100修复体。47%的修复体放置在被视为龋病高危患者的口中。根据改良的美国公共卫生署(USPHS)标准,对六个在RMGIC层厚度和预处理方面彼此不同的实验组在基线时以及在6至7年期间每年进行评估。
6年后,对220个修复体进行了评估。观察到42个失败病例(19%)。最常见的失败原因是材料断裂(n = 11)、牙齿折断(n = 9)和继发龋(n = 10)。在六个修复体中观察到RMGIC近端不可接受的溶解。在龋病高危患者中记录到显著更多的失败病例,但RMGIC的溶解情况相似。实验组之间或RMGIC层厚或薄的修复体之间未观察到差异。在7年时还对160个修复体进行了评估。又观察到13个失败病例,其中8个有不可接受的溶解,3个继发龋,2个折断。可以得出结论,对于所评估的大面积修复体,改良开放式三明治修复体显示出可接受的耐久性。在研究结束时观察到RMGIC有加速溶解的情况。