Landau R
Paul Baerwald School of Social Work and Social Welfare, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Mount Scopus, Jerusalem 91905, Israel.
Hum Reprod. 2004 Sep;19(9):1952-6. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deh360. Epub 2004 Jul 8.
In October 2003, the Attorney General of the Government of Israel published guidelines allowing posthumous sperm retrieval for the purpose of later insemination or IVF by the surviving female partner. This paper presents an ethical and psycho-social critique of the guidelines, which challenges their basic premise that personal autonomy over-rides any other ethical principle and argues that the autonomy of the adult should not over-ride the well-being of the offspring. It also shows that, despite the centrality of autonomy in the guidelines, they actually infringe on the autonomy of the deceased, and pose challenges to that of the surviving partner. It questions the propriety and very possibility of ascertaining the 'presumed wishes' of the deceased for a posthumous child. Finally, it argues against the document's presentation of posthumous sperm retrieval as a medical procedure and contends that, on the contrary, medicine and science are suborned to the exploitation of the dead.
2003年10月,以色列政府总检察长发布了指导方针,允许在伴侣去世后提取精子,以供在世的女性伴侣日后进行人工授精或体外受精。本文对这些指导方针进行了伦理和心理社会层面的批判,质疑了其基本前提,即个人自主权凌驾于任何其他伦理原则之上,并认为成年人的自主权不应凌驾于后代的福祉之上。本文还表明,尽管自主权在指导方针中占据核心地位,但它们实际上侵犯了死者的自主权,并给在世伴侣的自主权带来了挑战。本文质疑了确定死者对死后生育孩子的“推定意愿”的适当性和可能性。最后,本文反对将死后取精描述为一种医疗程序,并认为,相反,医学和科学沦为了对死者的剥削手段。