Bryant Penelope A, Li Hua Yi, Zaia Angelo, Griffith Julia, Hogg Geoff, Curtis Nigel, Carapetis Jonathan R
Paediatric Infectious Diseases Unit, Department of General Medicine, Royal Children's Hospital Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria 3052, Australia.
J Clin Microbiol. 2004 Jul;42(7):2919-25. doi: 10.1128/JCM.42.7.2919-2925.2004.
Due to the early administration of antibiotics, meningococcal disease is increasingly difficult to diagnose by culturing. Laboratory studies have shown PCR to be sensitive and specific, but there have been few clinical studies. The objectives of this study were to determine the diagnostic accuracy and clinical usefulness of meningococcal PCR through a prospective comparison of real-time PCR, nested PCR, and standard culturing of blood and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). The setting was a tertiary-care pediatric hospital in Australia, and the participants were 118 children admitted with possible septicemia or meningitis. The main outcome measures-sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values-were compared to a "gold standard " fulfilling clinical and laboratory criteria. For 24 cases of meningococcal disease diagnosed by the gold standard, culturing of blood or CSF was positive for 15 (63%), nested PCR was positive for 21 (88%), and real-time PCR was positive for 23 (96%). The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of real-time PCR (the most sensitive test) for all specimens were, respectively, 96% (95% confidence interval, 79 to 99%), 100% (95% confidence interval, 96 to 100%), 100% (95% confidence interval, 85 to 100%), and 99% (95% confidence interval, 94 to 100%). Of 54 patients with suspected meningococcal disease at admission, 23 had positive PCR results. Only one PCR specimen was positive in a patient thought unlikely to have meningococcal disease at admission. Blood PCR remained positive for 33% of patients tested at up to 72 h. Real-time PCR has high positive and negative predictive values in this clinical setting, with better confirmation of cases than nested PCR. Targeting patients for PCR based on admission criteria appears to be practical, and the test may remain useful for several days after the start of antibiotic administration.
由于早期使用抗生素,通过培养来诊断脑膜炎球菌病变得越来越困难。实验室研究表明,聚合酶链反应(PCR)具有敏感性和特异性,但临床研究较少。本研究的目的是通过对血液和脑脊液(CSF)进行实时PCR、巢式PCR和标准培养的前瞻性比较,来确定脑膜炎球菌PCR的诊断准确性和临床实用性。研究地点为澳大利亚一家三级护理儿童医院,参与者为118名因可能患有败血症或脑膜炎而入院的儿童。将主要结局指标——敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值——与符合临床和实验室标准的“金标准”进行比较。对于24例经金标准诊断为脑膜炎球菌病的病例,血液或脑脊液培养阳性的有15例(63%),巢式PCR阳性的有21例(88%),实时PCR阳性的有23例(96%)。实时PCR(最敏感的检测方法)对所有标本的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为96%(95%置信区间,79%至99%)、100%(95%置信区间,96%至100%)、100%(95%置信区间,85%至100%)和99%(95%置信区间,94%至100%)。入院时疑似脑膜炎球菌病的54例患者中,23例PCR结果为阳性。在入院时被认为不太可能患有脑膜炎球菌病的患者中,只有一份PCR标本呈阳性。在长达72小时的检测中,33%的患者血液PCR仍为阳性。在这种临床环境中,实时PCR具有较高的阳性和阴性预测值,与巢式PCR相比,对病例的确诊效果更好。根据入院标准对患者进行PCR检测似乎是可行的,并且该检测在抗生素治疗开始后的几天内可能仍然有用。