Walker Janine G, Jackson Henry J, Littlejohn Geoffrey O
Centre for Mental Health Research, Australian National University, Canberra.
Clin Psychol Rev. 2004 Aug;24(4):461-88. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2004.03.001.
There are a number of theoretical frameworks that attempt to explain how individuals may adjust to threats to health and serious physical illness. The three major paradigms that attempt to organize key components of health and adaptation to illness include the following: the biomedical model which emphasizes disease; psychological models of adaptation to illness; and biopsychosocial models with the latter two emphasizing health, functioning, and well-being. Each of these three major paradigms, including biomedical, psychosocial, and biopsychosocial frameworks, is discussed and critiqued in turn, and contributions and theoretical issues in terms of adjustment to chronic illness, particularly rheumatoid arthritis (RA), are highlighted. Furthermore, a biopsychosocial framework for conceptualizing adjustment to physical illness is proposed that incorporates elements from key existing biomedical and psychosocial models of adaptation to chronic physical health issues.
有许多理论框架试图解释个体如何适应健康威胁和严重身体疾病。试图组织健康和疾病适应关键要素的三个主要范式如下:强调疾病的生物医学模型;疾病适应的心理学模型;以及后两者强调健康、功能和幸福的生物心理社会模型。依次讨论并批判了这三个主要范式,包括生物医学、心理社会和生物心理社会框架,并强调了在慢性病,特别是类风湿性关节炎(RA)适应方面的贡献和理论问题。此外,还提出了一个用于概念化身体疾病适应的生物心理社会框架,该框架纳入了现有关键生物医学和心理社会模型中关于慢性身体健康问题适应的要素。