Department of Rheumatology , Maastricht University Medical Center , Maastricht , The Netherlands ; School for Public Health and Primary Care (CAPHRI), Maastricht University , Maastricht , The Netherlands.
Rheumazentrum Ruhrgebiet , Ruhr-University Bochum , Herne , Germany.
RMD Open. 2015 Nov 17;1(1):e000164. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2015-000164. eCollection 2015.
To investigate whether patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) adapt to their disease, using the 'then-test'.
Data from patients participating in the AS Study for Evaluation of Recombinant Infliximab Therapy (ASSERT) and continuing in the European AS Infliximab Cohort (EASIC) were used. At 5 assessments in EASIC, patients were asked to rerate their global well-being before the start of infliximab in ASSERT. The patients evaluated their past situation by using a 'then-test' ('retrospective patient global'). Initial and retrospective patient global were compared using a paired t test, and mixed linear models investigated whether the retrospective score of well-being was stable at all follow-up assessments in EASIC. Linear regression analysis explored whether treatment response was associated with the difference between the initial and retrospective score ('gap') while adjusting for possible confounders.
86 patients (mean age 39.8 years (SD=10.4), mean disease duration 10.8 years (SD=8.5)) contributed to the current analyses. At the time of starting infliximab, patients judged their global at 7.0 (SD=1.6), and with the 'then-test' at 7.2 (SD=2.3) (p=0.45). Time elapsed did not influence the 'then-test' (p=0.13). Multivariably, the gap was irrespective of treatment response, but associated with initial patient global (p<0.01) and initial Bath AS Disease Activity Index (p=0.02).
Patients with AS accurately judged their global well-being before starting treatment with tumour necrosis factor inhibition, even though substantial time had elapsed. The difference between initial and retrospective judgment was irrespective of treatment response. In this setting, the 'then-test' could not prove adaptation in AS.
NCT01286545.
通过“当时测试”研究强直性脊柱炎(AS)患者是否能适应疾病。
使用参与 AS 评估重组英夫利昔单抗治疗研究(ASSERT)并继续参与欧洲 AS 英夫利昔单抗队列研究(EASIC)的患者数据。在 EASIC 的 5 次评估中,患者被要求重新评估他们在 ASSERT 开始使用英夫利昔单抗之前的整体健康状况。患者通过“当时测试”(“回顾性患者整体评估”)来评估他们过去的情况。使用配对 t 检验比较初始和回顾性患者整体评估,混合线性模型调查在 EASIC 的所有随访评估中,回顾性健康评分是否稳定。线性回归分析在调整可能的混杂因素后,探讨了治疗反应与初始和回顾性评分之间的差异(“差距”)是否相关。
86 名患者(平均年龄 39.8 岁[标准差=10.4],平均疾病持续时间 10.8 年[标准差=8.5])参与了当前分析。在开始使用英夫利昔单抗时,患者对他们的整体状况的评估为 7.0(标准差=1.6),而通过“当时测试”的评估为 7.2(标准差=2.3)(p=0.45)。时间流逝并没有影响“当时测试”(p=0.13)。多变量分析表明,差距与治疗反应无关,但与初始患者整体评估(p<0.01)和初始巴斯强直性脊柱炎疾病活动指数(p=0.02)相关。
在开始使用肿瘤坏死因子抑制剂治疗之前,AS 患者准确判断了他们的整体健康状况,尽管时间已经过去了很长时间。初始和回顾性判断之间的差异与治疗反应无关。在这种情况下,“当时测试”不能证明 AS 的适应性。
NCT01286545。