Crist Gwen A, Langer Janine M, Woods Gail L, Procter Melinda, Hillyard David R
ARUP Laboratories, Salt Lake City, Utah 84108, USA.
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2004 Jul;49(3):173-7. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2004.03.008.
This study was conducted to assess the reliability of a commercial enzyme-linked viral inducible system (ELVIS) (Diagnostic Hybrids, Inc., Athens, OH) for rapid detection and typing of herpes simplex virus (HSV). Results using ELVIS were compared to those of shell vial culture (SVC) and HSV detection with monoclonal antibodies and an immunoperoxidase stain plus typing with MicroTrak direct fluorescent antibodies (Trinity Biotech PLC, Wicklow, Ireland). Specimens yielding discrepant HSV results were tested by polymerase chain reaction (PCR); those with discrepant typing results were stained with Simulfluor (Chemicon, Temecula, CA). Of the 206 samples tested, 144 were negative and 54 were HSV-positive by both methods (agreement, 96.1%). Five specimens were positive by ELVIS but negative by SVC; 3 of these were positive and 2 were negative by HSV PCR. Both of the latter were the result of mechanical problems early in the study. Three specimens were positive by SVC but negative by ELVIS; all 3 were positive by HSV PCR. After resolution of discrepancies, the sensitivity and specificity for detection of HSV were 95.0% and 100% for SVC, respectively, and 95.0% and 98.6% for ELVIS. Of the 46 HSV-positive samples that were typed, 26 were called type 2 and 18 were type 1 by both methods (agreement, 95.7%). The 2 specimens with discrepant results were called HSV-2 by SVC, staining with MicroTrak, and HSV-1 with ELVIS; both of these were type 2 when stained with the Simulfluor reagent. ELVIS is a reliable alternative to SVC for rapid detection and typing of HSV.
本研究旨在评估一种商用酶联病毒诱导系统(ELVIS)(诊断杂交公司,俄亥俄州雅典)用于单纯疱疹病毒(HSV)快速检测和分型的可靠性。将使用ELVIS的结果与空斑小瓶培养(SVC)以及用单克隆抗体和免疫过氧化物酶染色检测HSV并使用MicroTrak直接荧光抗体(Trinity Biotech PLC,爱尔兰威克洛)进行分型的结果进行比较。对产生不一致HSV结果的标本进行聚合酶链反应(PCR)检测;对分型结果不一致的标本用Simulfluor(Chemicon,加利福尼亚州特梅库拉)染色。在检测的206个样本中,144个为阴性,两种方法均显示54个为HSV阳性(一致性为96.1%)。5个标本ELVIS检测为阳性但SVC检测为阴性;其中3个经HSV PCR检测为阳性,2个为阴性。后两者均是研究早期机械问题导致的结果。3个标本SVC检测为阳性但ELVIS检测为阴性;所有3个经HSV PCR检测均为阳性。在解决差异后,SVC检测HSV的敏感性和特异性分别为95.0%和100%,ELVIS分别为95.0%和98.6%。在46个进行分型的HSV阳性样本中,两种方法均将26个判定为2型,18个判定为1型(一致性为95.7%)。2个结果不一致的标本,SVC、用MicroTrak染色判定为HSV-2,ELVIS判定为HSV-1;用Simulfluor试剂染色时两者均为2型。ELVIS是一种可靠的替代SVC的方法,可用于HSV的快速检测和分型。