Suppr超能文献

早发性或迟发性脓毒症休克:这有关系吗?

Septic shock of early or late onset: does it matter?

作者信息

Roman-Marchant Oscar, Orellana-Jimenez Carlos E A, De Backer Daniel, Melot Christian, Vincent Jean-Louis

机构信息

Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Erasme University Hospital, Free University of Brussels, Belgium.

出版信息

Chest. 2004 Jul;126(1):173-8. doi: 10.1378/chest.126.1.173.

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVES

To determine possible differences in morbidity and mortality between early and late onset of septic shock in ICU patients.

DESIGN

Systematic data collection.

SETTING

Thirty-one-bed, mixed, medicosurgical ICU in a university hospital.

PATIENTS

All 65 patients who acquired septic shock after admission to the ICU between February 1999 and April 2000.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS

Forty-one of the 65 patients presented with septic shock within 24 h of admission to the ICU (early septic shock [ESS]); the other 21 patients acquired septic shock > 24 h after ICU admission (late septic shock [LSS]). Eleven patients had a second episode (7 patients in the ESS group, and 4 patients in the LSS group), and 1 patient in the LSS group had a third episode of septic shock. Patients with ESS had higher APACHE (acute physiology and chronic health evaluation) II (mean +/- SD, 26 +/- 6 vs 20 +/- 6; p = 0.002) and sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) scores (11 +/- 3 vs 7 +/- 3, p < 0.001) on ICU admission, and a higher blood lactate concentration at the onset of shock (median 3.70 mEq/L; interquartile range, 2.6 to 6.6 mEq/L; vs median, 2.50 mEq/L [interquartile range, 1.8 to 4.0 mEq/L], p = 0.03) than patients with LSS. However, the duration of septic shock (median, 42 h [interquartile range, 21 to 97 h] vs median, 93 h [interquartile range, 32 to 241 h], p = 0.058) and the length of ICU stay after the onset of septic shock (median, 75 h; [interquartile range, 38 to 203 h] vs median, 321 h [interquartile range, 96 to 438 h], p = 0.018), was shorter in patients with ESS than patients with LSS. The ICU mortality rate was 63% (26 patients) in the ESS group, and 88% (21 patients) in the LSS group (p = 0.071). At the onset of the first episode of shock, patients with ESS had higher SOFA scores (11 +/- 3 vs 9 +/- 3, p = 0.045), lower pH (7.24 +/- 0.15 vs 7.33 +/- 0.12, p = 0.01), and were treated with higher doses of dopamine (median, 20 microg/kg/min [interquartile range, 14 to 20 microg/kg/min] vs median, 12 microg/kg/min [interquartile range, 8 to 20 microg/kg/min], p = 0.028) than patients with LSS.

CONCLUSIONS

Septic shock is more severe when of early onset, as reflected by more severe organ dysfunction, greater lactic acidosis, and higher vasopressor requirements, yet the outcome is better, as reflected by a shorter duration of the shock episode, shorter ICU stay, and slightly lower mortality rates. These differences may influence clinical trials of therapeutic agents for sepsis, and should be taken into account when analyzing the results.

摘要

研究目的

确定重症监护病房(ICU)患者中,脓毒性休克早期发作和晚期发作在发病率和死亡率方面可能存在的差异。

设计

系统数据收集。

地点

大学医院中拥有31张床位的混合内科外科ICU。

患者

1999年2月至2000年4月期间入住ICU后发生脓毒性休克的所有65例患者。

干预措施

无。

测量与结果

65例患者中有41例在入住ICU后24小时内出现脓毒性休克(早期脓毒性休克[ESS]);另外21例患者在入住ICU超过24小时后发生脓毒性休克(晚期脓毒性休克[LSS])。11例患者有第二次发作(ESS组7例,LSS组4例),LSS组有1例患者发生第三次脓毒性休克发作。ESS患者在入住ICU时急性生理与慢性健康状况评分系统(APACHE)II(均值±标准差,26±6 vs 20±6;p = 0.002)和序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分更高(11±3 vs 7±3,p < 0.001),且休克发作时血乳酸浓度更高(中位数3.70 mEq/L;四分位间距,2.6至6.6 mEq/L;vs中位数,2.50 mEq/L[四分位间距,1.8至4.0 mEq/L],p = 0.03)。然而,ESS患者的脓毒性休克持续时间(中位数,42小时[四分位间距,21至97小时] vs中位数,93小时[四分位间距,32至241小时],p = 0.058)和脓毒性休克发作后在ICU的住院时间(中位数,75小时;[四分位间距,38至203小时] vs中位数,321小时[四分位间距,96至438小时],p = 0.018)比LSS患者短。ESS组的ICU死亡率为63%(26例患者),LSS组为88%(21例患者)(p = 0.071)。在首次休克发作时,ESS患者的SOFA评分更高(11±3 vs 9±3,p = 0.045),pH值更低(7.24±0.15 vs 7.33±0.12,p = 0.01),且接受多巴胺治疗的剂量更高(中位数,20μg/kg/min[四分位间距,14至20μg/kg/min] vs中位数,12μg/kg/min[四分位间距,8至20μg/kg/min],p = 0.028)。

结论

早期发作的脓毒性休克更严重,表现为器官功能障碍更严重、乳酸酸中毒更明显以及血管升压药需求更高,但结局更好,表现为休克发作持续时间更短、ICU住院时间更短以及死亡率略低。这些差异可能会影响脓毒症治疗药物的临床试验,在分析结果时应予以考虑。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验