Suppr超能文献

急诊科高依赖病房收治的脓毒症患者早期分层的预后评分

Prognostic scores for early stratification of septic patients admitted to an emergency department-high dependency unit.

作者信息

Innocenti Francesca, Bianchi Simone, Guerrini Elisa, Vicidomini Sonia, Conti Alberto, Zanobetti Maurizio, Pini Riccardo

机构信息

High Dependency Unit, Department of Critical Care Medicine and Surgery, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, Firenze, Italy.

出版信息

Eur J Emerg Med. 2014 Aug;21(4):254-9. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0000000000000075.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to identify a reliable tool for the early prognostic stratification of septic patients admitted to the emergency department-high dependency unit (ED-HDU), a clinical setting providing a subintensive level of care; we also estimated the cost saving associated with HDU stay compared with ICU stay.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Mortality in Emergency Department Sepsis (MEDS), Acute Physiology Age Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II), Simplified Acute Physiology Score II (SAPS II), Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score (SOFA-T0) and the Charlson index were calculated at ED admission. SOFA score was also calculated after 24 h (SOFA-T1). The primary outcome was 28 days mortality.

RESULTS

We admitted 140 patients with severe sepsis or septic shock in our ED-HDU from June 2008 to December 2010; 135 were included in the study. One month's mortality was 29%. SOFA-T1 was significantly higher in patients who needed an ICU admission (7.5±3.8 vs. 5.3±3.0, P=0.048); it also showed the best mortality prediction ability (area under the curve 0.80, 95% confidence interval 0.70-0.91), compared with MEDS, SAPS, and APACHE score. Troponin and procalcitonin evaluated at ED admission and after 24 h did not show significant differences according to prognosis; patients with lactate more than 2 showed a higher mortality (40 vs. 22%, P=0.034). In a regression analysis adjusted for age, lactate value, and the Charlson index, SOFA-T1 (RR 1.551, 95% confidence interval 1.204-1.998, P<0.001) maintained an independent prognostic value for 28 days mortality. During the 267 days of stay at the ED-HDU, the total saving was &OV0556;460 041, compared with the cost of the same period in the ICU.

CONCLUSION

SOFA score is a feasible and accurate tool for an early risk stratification of septic patients admitted to the ED-HDU.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在确定一种可靠的工具,用于对入住急诊科高依赖病房(ED-HDU,提供亚重症护理水平的临床环境)的脓毒症患者进行早期预后分层;我们还估计了与入住重症监护病房(ICU)相比,入住HDU节省的费用。

材料与方法

在急诊科入院时计算急诊科脓毒症死亡率(MEDS)、急性生理与慢性健康状况评估II(APACHE II)、简化急性生理学评分II(SAPS II)、序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分(SOFA-T0)和Charlson指数。24小时后(SOFA-T1)也计算SOFA评分。主要结局为28天死亡率。

结果

2008年6月至2010年12月,我们的ED-HDU收治了140例严重脓毒症或脓毒性休克患者;135例纳入研究。1个月死亡率为29%。需要入住ICU的患者SOFA-T1显著更高(7.5±3.8对5.3±3.0,P=0.048);与MEDS、SAPS和APACHE评分相比,它还显示出最佳的死亡率预测能力(曲线下面积0.80,95%置信区间0.70-0.91)。急诊科入院时和24小时后评估的肌钙蛋白和降钙素原根据预后未显示出显著差异;乳酸水平超过2的患者死亡率更高(40%对22%,P=0.034)。在对年龄、乳酸值和Charlson指数进行校正的回归分析中,SOFA-T1(风险比1.551,95%置信区间1.204-1.998,P<0.001)对28天死亡率保持独立的预后价值。在ED-HDU住院的267天里,与同期ICU费用相比,总共节省了460 041欧元。

结论

SOFA评分是对入住ED-HDU的脓毒症患者进行早期风险分层的一种可行且准确的工具。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验