• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与脓毒症相关的器官功能障碍的发生率及影响

Incidence and impact of organ dysfunctions associated with sepsis.

作者信息

Guidet Bertrand, Aegerter Philippe, Gauzit Remy, Meshaka Patrick, Dreyfuss Didier

机构信息

Service de Réanimation Médicale, Hôpital Saint-Antoine, 184, rue du Faubourg Saint-Antoine, 75012 Paris, France.

出版信息

Chest. 2005 Mar;127(3):942-51. doi: 10.1378/chest.127.3.942.

DOI:10.1378/chest.127.3.942
PMID:15764780
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To study the incidence and severity of organ dysfunction associated with sepsis.

DESIGN

Comprehensive review of prospectively collected data from intensive care patients hospitalized between 1997 and 2001.

SETTING

Thirty-five ICUs in nonuniversity and university hospitals located in the Paris area.

PATIENTS

All patients hospitalized in the ICU for > 24 h meeting the criteria for severe sepsis (SS), either with only one organ dysfunction present during the ICU stay (SS1; n = 5,675) or with at least two organ dysfunction present during the ICU stay (SS2; n = 12,598), were compared to all other patients hospitalized for > 24 h in the ICU over the same time period (n = 47,637).

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

We collected information on demographic characteristics, type of admission, underlying disease, organ dysfunction, organ support, McCabe and Charlson-Deyo scores, simplified acute physiology score II, length of stay, and outcome. The incidence of SS was 27.7% (8.6% for SS1 and 19.1 for SS2). Compared with non-SS patients, those with SS were significantly older, were more frequently men, required organ support more frequently, had higher severity scores, and stayed longer in the ICU and hospital. Respiratory and cardiovascular dysfunction and fungal infection were strong independent risk factors for death in SS patients, with 5.64-fold, 4.35-fold, and 2.0-fold increased risks, respectively. SS2 is significantly different from SS1: older age, more surgical stays and admission from external transfer, greater number of organ supports, site of infection (less pulmonary and urinary tract infections, and more abdominal and cardiovascular infections), type of bacteria (more methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas, and fungus), ICU length of stay (20.4 d vs 11.6 d), hospital length of stay (33 d vs 27.9 d), ICU mortality (42.7% vs 5.5%), and hospital mortality (49% vs 11.3%).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study identifies a subgroup of patients with an ICU stay > 24 h and SS with at least two organ dysfunctions. This group of patients requires special attention since their ICU mortality is > 40% and they occupy almost 40% of all ICU beds.

摘要

目的

研究脓毒症相关器官功能障碍的发生率及严重程度。

设计

对1997年至2001年期间入住重症监护病房的患者前瞻性收集的数据进行全面回顾。

地点

位于巴黎地区的非大学医院和大学医院中的35个重症监护病房。

患者

将入住重症监护病房超过24小时且符合严重脓毒症(SS)标准的所有患者进行比较,其中在重症监护病房住院期间仅出现一种器官功能障碍的患者(SS1;n = 5675)或至少出现两种器官功能障碍的患者(SS2;n = 12598),与同期在重症监护病房住院超过24小时的所有其他患者(n = 47637)进行比较。

干预措施

无。

测量指标及主要结果

我们收集了有关人口统计学特征、入院类型、基础疾病、器官功能障碍、器官支持、麦凯布评分和查尔森 - 德约评分、简化急性生理学评分II、住院时间和结局的信息。SS的发生率为27.7%(SS1为8.6%,SS2为19.1%)。与非SS患者相比,SS患者年龄显著更大,男性更常见,更频繁需要器官支持,严重程度评分更高,在重症监护病房和医院的住院时间更长。呼吸和心血管功能障碍以及真菌感染是SS患者死亡的强烈独立危险因素,风险分别增加5.64倍、4.35倍和2.0倍。SS2与SS1有显著差异:年龄更大,手术住院和外部转入的情况更多,器官支持的数量更多,感染部位(肺部和尿路感染较少,腹部和心血管感染较多),细菌类型(耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌、铜绿假单胞菌和真菌更多),重症监护病房住院时间(20.4天对11.6天),医院住院时间(33天对27.9天),重症监护病房死亡率(42.7%对5.5%),以及医院死亡率(49%对11.3%)。

结论

我们的研究确定了一组在重症监护病房住院超过24小时且患有至少两种器官功能障碍的严重脓毒症患者。这组患者需要特别关注,因为他们的重症监护病房死亡率超过40%,并且占用了几乎40%的重症监护病房床位。

相似文献

1
Incidence and impact of organ dysfunctions associated with sepsis.与脓毒症相关的器官功能障碍的发生率及影响
Chest. 2005 Mar;127(3):942-51. doi: 10.1378/chest.127.3.942.
2
Survival analysis of 314 episodes of sepsis in medical intensive care unit in university hospital: impact of intensive care unit performance and antimicrobial therapy.大学医院医学重症监护病房314例脓毒症发作的生存分析:重症监护病房性能及抗菌治疗的影响
Croat Med J. 2006 Jun;47(3):385-97.
3
Incidence, Risk Factors, and Attributable Mortality of Secondary Infections in the Intensive Care Unit After Admission for Sepsis.入住 ICU 后脓毒症继发感染的发生率、危险因素和归因死亡率。
JAMA. 2016 Apr 12;315(14):1469-79. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.2691.
4
Brazilian Sepsis Epidemiological Study (BASES study).巴西脓毒症流行病学研究(BASES研究)。
Crit Care. 2004 Aug;8(4):R251-60. doi: 10.1186/cc2892. Epub 2004 Jun 15.
5
Septic shock of early or late onset: does it matter?早发性或迟发性脓毒症休克:这有关系吗?
Chest. 2004 Jul;126(1):173-8. doi: 10.1378/chest.126.1.173.
6
Severe sepsis and its impact on outcome in elderly and very elderly patients admitted in intensive care unit.严重脓毒症及其对入住重症监护病房的老年和非常老年患者预后的影响。
J Intensive Care Med. 2012 May-Jun;27(3):179-83. doi: 10.1177/0885066610397116. Epub 2011 Mar 24.
7
Incidence, risk factors, and outcome of severe sepsis and septic shock in adults. A multicenter prospective study in intensive care units. French ICU Group for Severe Sepsis.成人严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克的发病率、危险因素及转归。一项在重症监护病房开展的多中心前瞻性研究。法国重症监护病房严重脓毒症研究组
JAMA. 1995 Sep 27;274(12):968-74.
8
Does severe non-infectious SIRS differ from severe sepsis? Results from a multi-centre Australian and New Zealand intensive care unit study.严重非感染性全身炎症反应综合征与严重脓毒症有何不同?一项澳大利亚和新西兰多中心重症监护病房研究的结果。
Intensive Care Med. 2008 Sep;34(9):1654-61. doi: 10.1007/s00134-008-1160-2. Epub 2008 May 27.
9
Multicenter observational study of the development of progressive organ dysfunction and therapeutic interventions in normotensive sepsis patients in the emergency department.多中心观察性研究:正常血压脓毒症患者在急诊科进展性器官功能障碍的发生和治疗干预。
Acad Emerg Med. 2013 May;20(5):433-40. doi: 10.1111/acem.12137.
10
Sepsis and organ system failure are major determinants of post-intensive care unit mortality.脓毒症和器官系统功能衰竭是重症监护病房后死亡率的主要决定因素。
J Crit Care. 2008 Dec;23(4):475-83. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2007.09.006. Epub 2008 Apr 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Development and validation of a Nomogram for the prediction of patients with sepsis-induced multiple organ dysfunction syndrome.用于预测脓毒症诱导的多器官功能障碍综合征患者的列线图的开发与验证
Pak J Med Sci. 2025 Apr;41(4):1036-1046. doi: 10.12669/pjms.41.4.10421.
2
Clinical characteristics and prognostic factors of sepsis in patients with malignancy.恶性肿瘤患者脓毒症的临床特征及预后因素
Sci Rep. 2025 Feb 27;15(1):7078. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-87457-y.
3
One-Hour Bundle Protocols for Surgical Sepsis and Septic Shock in Surgical Intensive Care Unit: Clinical Outcome Aspects in the Thai Context.
外科重症监护病房中手术性脓毒症和脓毒性休克的一小时捆绑式治疗方案:泰国背景下的临床结果分析
Cureus. 2024 Jun 12;16(6):e62215. doi: 10.7759/cureus.62215. eCollection 2024 Jun.
4
Baricitinib protects mice from sepsis-induced cardiac dysfunction and multiple-organ failure.巴利昔替尼可保护小鼠免受脓毒症引起的心脏功能障碍和多器官衰竭。
Front Immunol. 2023 Sep 12;14:1223014. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1223014. eCollection 2023.
5
ICU-Mortality in Old and Very Old Patients Suffering From Sepsis and Septic Shock.老年及高龄脓毒症和脓毒性休克患者的重症监护病房死亡率
Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 Jul 9;8:697884. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.697884. eCollection 2021.
6
Factors associated with outcomes of septic shock patients receiving high dose noradrenaline according to three primary infection sites.根据三个主要感染部位,与接受大剂量去甲肾上腺素治疗的感染性休克患者预后相关的因素。
J Int Med Res. 2020 Feb;48(2):300060519874545. doi: 10.1177/0300060519874545. Epub 2019 Sep 17.
7
Is research from databases reliable? Yes.来自数据库的研究可靠吗?可靠。
Intensive Care Med. 2019 Jan;45(1):118-121. doi: 10.1007/s00134-018-5436-x. Epub 2018 Dec 14.
8
Independent risk factors for mortality in critically ill patients with candidemia on Italian Internal Medicine Wards.危重症念珠菌血症患者的意大利内科病房死亡率的独立危险因素。
Intern Emerg Med. 2018 Mar;13(2):199-204. doi: 10.1007/s11739-017-1783-9. Epub 2018 Jan 10.
9
Differences in reported sepsis incidence according to study design: a literature review.根据研究设计报告的败血症发病率差异:一项文献综述
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2016 Oct 12;16(1):137. doi: 10.1186/s12874-016-0237-9.
10
Role of kidney injury in sepsis.肾脏损伤在脓毒症中的作用。
J Intensive Care. 2016 Mar 23;4:17. doi: 10.1186/s40560-016-0146-3. eCollection 2016.