Bender Tamás, Karagülle Zeki, Bálint Géza P, Gutenbrunner Christoph, Bálint Péter V, Sukenik Shaul
Polyclinic of Brother of St. John of God Hospitals, 7 Arpád fejedelem St, Budapest, Hungary 1025.
Rheumatol Int. 2005 Apr;25(3):220-4. doi: 10.1007/s00296-004-0487-4. Epub 2004 Jul 15.
The use of water for medical treatment is probably as old as mankind. Until the middle of the last century, spa treatment, including hydrotherapy and balneotherapy, remained popular but went into decline especially in the Anglo-Saxon world with the development of effective analgesics. However, no analgesic, regardless of its potency, is capable of eliminating pain, and reports of life-threatening adverse reactions to the use of these drugs led to renewed interest in spa therapy. Because of methodologic difficulties and lack of research funding, the effects of 'water treatments' in the relief of pain have rarely been subjected to rigorous assessment by randomised, controlled trials. It is our opinion that the three therapeutic modalities must be considered separately, and this was done in the present paper. In addition, we review the research on the mechanism of action and cost effectiveness of such treatments and examine what research might be useful in the future.
用水进行医疗治疗的历史可能与人类历史一样悠久。直到上世纪中叶,包括水疗法和温泉疗法在内的温泉治疗一直很受欢迎,但随着有效镇痛药的发展,尤其是在盎格鲁 - 撒克逊世界,温泉治疗逐渐衰落。然而,无论镇痛药的效力如何,都无法消除疼痛,而且有关使用这些药物出现危及生命的不良反应的报道,使得人们对温泉疗法重新产生了兴趣。由于方法学上的困难以及缺乏研究资金,“水疗法”缓解疼痛的效果很少通过随机对照试验进行严格评估。我们认为,这三种治疗方式必须分别考虑,本文就是这样做的。此外,我们回顾了此类治疗的作用机制和成本效益的研究,并探讨了未来可能有用的研究方向。