Schubiner H H, LeBar W D, Joseph S, Taylor C, Jemal C
University Health Center, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan 48201.
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1992 Jun;11(6):553-6. doi: 10.1007/BF01960814.
The performance of two new enzyme immunoassays (EIA) for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in a practice setting was compared. A consecutive series of 207 female patients seen at an inner-city sexually transmitted disease clinic were tested by cell culture, the Kodak SureCell (SC) and Abbott TestPack Chlamydia (TP) EIAs. In addition 210 male patients, selected by physicians on the basis of the fact that multiple urethral samples could be obtained, were tested by cell culture and SC. The prevalence of infection was 19% in the females and 12.5% in males. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value for the SC and TP were 88%, 95%, 81%, 97% and 59%, 99%, 95%, 91%, respectively, in the female population. The sensitivity of the SC was significantly greater than that of the TP (p less than or equal to 0.002). The performance values of the SC in men (in the same order) were 64%, 96%, 71% and 95%, respectively. The SC in male patients and the TP in female patients had low sensitivity. The sensitivity of the SC in female patients was significantly higher than that of the TP. However, the SC yielded more false positive results. To determine the utility of these tests in a practice setting further studies are required.
比较了两种新型酶免疫测定法(EIA)在实际应用中检测沙眼衣原体的性能。在一家市中心性传播疾病诊所对连续就诊的207名女性患者进行了检测,检测方法包括细胞培养、柯达SureCell(SC)和雅培TestPack衣原体(TP)EIA。此外,由医生根据能够获取多个尿道样本这一事实挑选出210名男性患者,对其进行细胞培养和SC检测。女性感染率为19%,男性为12.5%。在女性人群中,SC和TP的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为88%、95%、81%、97%和59%、99%、95%、91%。SC的敏感性显著高于TP(p小于或等于0.002)。SC在男性中的检测性能值(按相同顺序)分别为64%、96%、71%和95%。男性患者中的SC和女性患者中的TP敏感性较低。女性患者中SC的敏感性显著高于TP。然而,SC产生的假阳性结果更多。为了确定这些检测方法在实际应用中的效用,还需要进一步研究。